[BeHoldAPaleHorse]

So it shows that there were gunshot wounds.

Problem: the first after-action report said that the decedents were all killed by shrapnel from the IED that opened the ambush.

I haven't seen anything yet that shows anybody DOING the shooting!

I was a cop before losing one of my two favorite lungs to a bullet. When a witness says "It was A," and the forensics comes back and says, "Not A at all, it was B," and A and B are extremely different, the witness gets promoted to "suspect."

[LADY J]

>So it shows that there were gunshot wounds. Problem: the first after-action report said that the decedents were all killed by shrapnel from the IED that opened the ambush.

I haven't seen anything yet that shows anybody DOING the shooting!

I was a cop before losing one of my two favorite lungs to a bullet. When a witness says "It was A," and the forensics comes back and says, "Not A at all, it was B," and A and B are extremely different, the witness gets promoted to "suspect."<

So sorry about the incident of your being shot. I hope all is well with you now.

Who did the forensic work on the bodies? I haven't heard that yet. Seems all we hear about are pictures of the bodies with bullet wounds. I'm even wondering if they are the same people!!

Maybe it's a stretch - but the first after-action report could be right - and the bodies replaced by the insurgents trying to give the Marines a bad name. From what I understand is that the Marines that came in to recover the bodies did it the next day. Am I wrong?

I just don't trust those people. Maybe it's just me!