Thanks Mr. Corsi, for writing this article.
To: hedgetrimmer
The SPP agreement was reached between President Bush, President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin during their March 2005 summit meeting in Waco, Texas. Wonder what else Fox won (demanded) at the meeting?
2 posted on
06/01/2006 7:22:00 AM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: gubamyster; Spiff; SandRat; calcowgirl; texastoo; nicmarlo; Quix; Dark Skies; Czar; tertiary01; ...
Mr Corsi continues his extremely well researched series of articles on the death of American sovereignty and constitutional government.
3 posted on
06/01/2006 7:22:40 AM PDT by
hedgetrimmer
("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
I have a friend that works for Boeing, and spends a lot of time in SE Asia, Asia and in Africa. At $.10 an hour those goods manufactured overseas, still seem to cost about the same amount in the US as if they were being built in country. The prices are being set by whatever the area can support. A radio that costs $99 in America, will sell for $19 in Africa. The same holds true for many products. Since business does not like to lose money, I wonder what model they use to set pricing? Are first world consumers subsidizing the cost of products to the third world?
6 posted on
06/01/2006 7:39:23 AM PDT by
jeremiah
(How much did we get for that rope?)
To: hedgetrimmer
It sounds to me like our country doesn't want its own citizens to get decent wages and is doing everything it can to bypass them. Who's looking out for the average working U.S. Citizen?
To: hedgetrimmer
Mostly sounds like a free market finding the lowest cost way to deliver goods to consumers. That benefits nearly everyone except union bosses.
To: hedgetrimmer
BUMP!
Indeed, this seems to be a big part of the seamy-underside of the whole agenda. It underpins a lot.
Of course, when the dollar collapses, Americans will be paying attention...and the people who made the collapse happen will not be popular with the electorate. And I fear they may have permanently scarred the Republican party reputation because of the doctrinnaire idealogues in the White House and RNC.
18 posted on
06/01/2006 9:26:26 AM PDT by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: hedgetrimmer
Who's paying for this thing, which will primarily benefit the Import Lobby?
The taxpayer?
21 posted on
06/01/2006 9:39:40 AM PDT by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: hedgetrimmer
Thanks for the ping.
Putting aside the discussion of whether integration of three countries, one being a socialist leaning, (at least the eastern part)...and one being a corrupt oligarchy, is ultimately a good thing or a bad thing, (the EU tells us its a BAD BAD thing) or even a necessary thing to compete with China...
Who gave these elected officials the power to make these kinds of fundamental long term decisions concerning the sovereignty, political, economic, and cultural identity of the US...
WITHOUT...
First putting this plan before the people, and getting their approval?
Did we elect this plan...did we vote on it? Did I miss it during the campaign speeches of the President and a multitude of the Congressmen??
Will this plan be submitted for as vote...after the fact..when it is a formality?
30 posted on
06/01/2006 9:29:49 PM PDT by
Dat Mon
(Weldon, Shaffer, Philpott.......Men of Honor)
To: hedgetrimmer; TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; anymouse; ...
BTTT!
Trans-Texas Corridor PING!
67 posted on
06/03/2006 12:58:43 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(One flag--American. One language--English. One allegiance--to America!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson