Posted on 05/31/2006 10:47:42 PM PDT by SmithL
Life in the San Francisco Unified School District often seems to lurch from one financial crisis to another: Lay-offs. Program cuts. School closures. Frantic contract negotiations nearly ending in strikes.
But according to new figures provided by the U.S. Census, San Francisco public schools are rolling in money compared to other districts around the state and even the nation. They spend more per student than the vast majority of other large districts in California and even most of the big districts around the country.
So why all the hand-wringing about money?
At the same time the school district faces declining student enrollment and the resulting loss of state money, it is seeing its worker health-care costs skyrocket. It's a math equation even an elementary school student could see doesn't leave a lot left over for classroom use.
The district, which enrolls 57,675 students in its regular kindergarten to 12th-grade classes and its county programs, employs 6,000 teachers and aides, 1,200 service workers and 214 administrators.
For every dollar it currently spends on day-to-day operating expenses, 47 cents go to teacher and administrator salaries, 21 cents go to employee benefits and 11 cents go to pay non-teaching employees. Twenty cents pay for a variety of other expenses, such as utilities and professional training.
Just one penny goes to books and supplies.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
Ha ha! Socialism still doesn't work! :P
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
In what other industry could a 23 year-old person having worked as a janitor for only five yearsget a benefit with a lifetime present value of at least a half million dollars?
Karen Bishop, president of the school district chapter for Service Employees International Union 790, said it's unfair to blame district financial problems on service employees.
"They should look at other places where they may not be wisely spending money," she said. "We think that's a benefit we deserve."
LMAO.
Kinda ironic that the school employees get to spend more on schooling for themselves than the students get.
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
You've seen it happening in the airlines.
You've seen it happening in the auto industry.
Now there is only one industry (if you can call it that) that still maintains a defined benefit pension program: government.
It will take longer for them to come to Jesus because they can always try to tax their way to prosperity (an approach Churchill described as standing in a bucket and trying to lift it by the handles). But they too will hit the wall.
The thing is, you can't have an expanding number of non-workers living off a rake-off from a declining or even static number of workers forever. There are many more people in the USA than there were fifty years ago, but not many more workers (and in many industries, fewer workers).
The politicians take comfort in their ignorance of numbers but the numbers matter whether you understand them or not.
I remember being a kid and feeling sorry for janitors. Right now a school janitor is more likely than a DC-10 captain to have a pension he can count on. But they'll both lose their social security to the illegals.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Just slap a $20 a pack tax on cigarettes, that'll fix 'er. :)
With a student-teacher ratio of less than 10:1, they should by far have the best schools in the country. Most school districts have ratios approaching 30:1.
With less than 10 students per teacher and the biggest hit on the budget being the payroll it seems obvious they have too many teachers.
"So why all the hand-wringing about money?"
Because we're on to you. Socialism in your face is ugly!
More than one adult per ten children. Aides are not teachers. Useful would be a breakdown in the type of teacher. Also the costs of administration should be broken out. Superintendents commonly earn more than the President of the United States and asst. superintendents more than cabinet members. The rule of thumb is that the lowest paid asst. Principal will earn more than the highest paid teacher. Not that teachers are likely to be poor. Most teachers are part of two income households. Just guessing, I gather that the average teacher spouse will earn at least as much as the average teacher. So the average income of such a household may be as much as $120,000 a year. Not huge, but well within the middle class.
That's 9.6 students per each teacher/aide. Is that typical? Back when I was a kid, there'd be 30 of us, and no aide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.