Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

That is what they are hoping for...I think 2/3rds of the states need to pass the law....


21 posted on 05/31/2006 3:20:19 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: BurbankKarl

No, 3/4ths of the states need to approve Amendments to the US Constitution. In short, it'd never pass.


56 posted on 05/31/2006 3:43:54 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: BurbankKarl
That is what they are hoping for...I think 2/3rds of the states need to pass the law...

No, this is a proposed compact between the states. It only has to be approved by each state. Each state has the right to allocate its electoral votes anyway it sees fit. The proposed compact can be entered into and withdrawn from by its member states.

"Besides California, legislation to create a compact was introduced this year in Colorado, Missouri, Illinois and Louisiana. Proponents are pushing to have similar bills in all 50 states next year."

This is an end run around the electoral college, which would require a constitutional amendment to change. This compact would give the bigger states more power to determine the outcome.

69 posted on 05/31/2006 3:50:25 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: BurbankKarl
That is what they are hoping for...I think 2/3rds of the states need to pass the law....

Constitutional amendments need 3/4ths of the states. So they know that will never happen.

71 posted on 05/31/2006 3:51:19 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: BurbankKarl
.I think 2/3rds of the states need to pass the law....

It does not matter how many states pass such a law, to the extent that it affects the power of non-cooperating states in the selection of the President, it is an unconstitutional confederation (Article I, section 10).

OF course, 2/3 of the states can call a convention, amend the constitution (If 3/4 of the states agree), and thereby git 'er done.

But the California proposal is unconstitutional.

243 posted on 06/01/2006 4:48:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson