Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BurbankKarl
"AB 2948 would commit California to a compact in which each participating state would cast all its electoral votes for the presidential candidate receiving the most popular votes nationwide."

I was following the thread, but had to go back a re-read this part once again. Theoretically, this would mean that 100% of the population of one state could vote for Candidate A, but because Candidate B wins the popular vote nationwide, the electors would be forced to discard the state popular view in favor of the national popular view, and vote Candidate B.

So going back to this idiot's first grade premise, since when does a candidate that is unanimously elected in a state, by the population of the state, not win the state's electors? This is absolutely insane.

118 posted on 05/31/2006 4:31:15 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Lucky participant in 189 different Nigerian business deals......still waiting on payment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cincinnati65
So going back to this idiot's first grade premise, since when does a candidate that is unanimously elected in a state, by the population of the state, not win the state's electors? This is absolutely insane.

Not so insane. The states can award their electoral votes any way they want as long as its citizens agree to it. This is not something coming from a bunch of nuts. It is a very serious challenge to our electoral process supported by the NYT, Chicago Sun Times, Minneapolis Star Tribune, and others.

EVERY VOTE EQUAL: A State-Based Plan For Electing The President By National Popular Vote

126 posted on 05/31/2006 4:38:30 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: cincinnati65; BurbankKarl
"AB 2948 would commit California to a compact in which each participating state would cast all its electoral votes for the presidential candidate receiving the most popular votes nationwide."
I was following the thread, but had to go back a re-read this part once again. Theoretically, this would mean that 100% of the population of one state could vote for Candidate A, but because Candidate B wins the popular vote nationwide, the electors would be forced to discard the state popular view in favor of the national popular view, and vote Candidate B.

Yeah, when I read that I was just thinking, "imagine the screaming from California's liberals the first time that all of California's electoral votes get thrown to a *Republican* even though the majority of Californians voted for the *Democrat*...

182 posted on 05/31/2006 6:59:37 PM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson