Hmm.. like the Sandy Burgular affair?.. Bill Clinton selling the Chinese the "Aegis System" and god knows what else?.. Like the democrat party literally stealing the Social Security trust fund, long ago?.. like the Federal Reserve Banking Act that was never fully ratified?...
Miranda accomplishs NOTHING.. except denyablity of the appearance of guilt.. The Miranda verbal cascade recited to the arrestee STOPS NO malfeance by the LEO's.. IF the LEO has a mind to mal-fease.. The court would/could appoint a lawyer whether the recital was read OR not..
You cannot cleanup the LEO system or even keep them honest by the mere recital of a few words.. If so; a so called Miranda type caveat should be read daily to every District Attorney and Judge.. where as much malfeance goes on as with the arresting COP.. maybe more.. considering plea bargins and all that..
Miranda merely puts lipstick on lawyers(and judges) making them appear better looking Drama Queens.. it aborts zero malfeance..
I disagree for the reasons I already mentioned. Thank you for your opinion.