Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator

Your argument could be made about Health Insurance and dietary, exercise, and lifestyle choices. I expect you would be on the side of mandating exercise, no sugar, only good fats, no anal intercourse - etc. Since all these drive up your health insurance premiums.


547 posted on 05/31/2006 4:37:43 PM PDT by GregoryFul (off with their heads!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: GregoryFul

Several problems with that statement.

There are still many questions about just which foods are healthy, there can be no question that seat belts save lives.

Also it's a matter of enforcement, you simply cannot enforce rules mandating eating without a true police state, that is not an issue with seat belts.


548 posted on 05/31/2006 4:39:45 PM PDT by dfwgator (Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson