Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tokra
and they both affect other peoples safety.

What BS

Socialism has nothing to do with either of these laws.

Correct, it's NANNYSTATISM. And modern liberalism.

Why is it OK to have speed limits, but not seat belt laws.

One violates others rights, one doesn't.

357 posted on 05/31/2006 1:00:52 PM PDT by Protagoras ("A real decision is measured by the fact that you have taken a new action"... Tony Robbins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: Protagoras
Why is it OK to have speed limits, but not seat belt laws.

One violates others rights, one doesn't.

Explain that statement. How does me driving fast violate other's rights? Because I may injure them in an accident? Well, I can still injure them in an accident by not wearing a seat belt and becoming a human projectile. It has happened.

415 posted on 05/31/2006 1:56:00 PM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson