Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Click it or ticket
townhall ^ | 5/24/06 | Walter WIlliams

Posted on 05/31/2006 9:42:50 AM PDT by from occupied ga

Virginia's secretary of transportation sent out a letter announcing the state's annual "Click It or Ticket" campaign May 22 through June 4. I responded to the secretary of transportation with my own letter that in part reads:

"Mr. Secretary: This is an example of the disgusting abuse of state power. Each of us owns himself, and it follows that we should have the liberty to take risks with our own lives but not that of others. That means it's a legitimate use of state power to mandate that cars have working brakes because if my car has poorly functioning brakes, I risk the lives of others and I have no right to do so. If I don't wear a seatbelt I risk my own life, which is well within my rights. As to your statement 'Lack of safety belt use is a growing public health issue that . . . also costs us all billions of dollars every year,' that's not a problem of liberty. It's a problem of socialism. No human should be coerced by the state to bear the medical expense, or any other expense, for his fellow man. In other words, the forcible use of one person to serve the purposes of another is morally offensive."

My letter went on to tell the secretary that I personally wear a seatbelt each time I drive; it's a good idea. However, because something is a good idea doesn't necessarily make a case for state compulsion. The justifications used for "Click It or Ticket" easily provide the template and soften us up for other forms of government control over our lives.

For example, my weekly exercise routine consists of three days' weight training and three days' aerobic training. I think it's a good idea. Like seatbelt use, regular exercise extends lives and reduces health care costs. Here's my question to government officials and others who sanction the "Click It or Ticket" campaign: Should the government mandate daily exercise for the same reasons they cite to support mandatory seatbelt use, namely, that to do so would save lives and save billions of health care dollars?

If we accept the notion that government ought to protect us from ourselves, we're on a steep slippery slope. Obesity is a major contributor to hypertension, coronary disease and diabetes, and leads not only to many premature deaths but billions of dollars in health care costs. Should government enforce, depending on a person's height, sex and age, a daily 1,400 to 2,000-calorie intake limit? There's absolutely no dietary reason to add salt to our meals. High salt consumption can lead to high blood pressure, which can then lead to stroke, heart attack, osteoporosis and asthma. Should government outlaw adding salt to meals? While you might think that these government mandates would never happen, be advised that there are busybody groups currently pushing for government mandates on how much and what we can eat.

Government officials, if given power to control us, soon become zealots. Last year, Maryland state troopers were equipped with night vision goggles, similar to those used by our servicemen in Iraq, to catch night riders not wearing seatbelts. Maryland state troopers boasted that they bagged 44 drivers traveling unbuckled under the cover of darkness.

Philosopher John Stuart Mill, in his treatise "On Liberty," said it best:  "That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise, or even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him, or visiting him with any evil, in case he do otherwise."

Dr. Williams serves on the faculty of George Mason University in Fairfax, VA as John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 4a; 4thamendment; clickitorticket; donutwatch; fourthamendment; governmentabuse; govwatch; libertarians; mdm; policeabuse; seatbelt; seatbelts; walterwilliams
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 661-670 next last
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
So many people now drive with the bare minimum of insurance

Most people I know have bare minimum + uninsured, unless they have a newer car. Rates are so ridiculously high out here that only those with really nice cars want comprehensive.

501 posted on 05/31/2006 3:04:31 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (http://folding.stanford.edu/ - - - -Folding@home. Free Republic team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
It has long been my contention that people who go into police work are not the sort that think any laws are stupid, useless or downright evil

I know it's got to seem that way but they are required to enforce even the most ridiculous laws if they are going to honor their oath.

502 posted on 05/31/2006 3:04:49 PM PDT by capt. norm (Ben Franklin: "Does thou love life? Then do not squander time; for that's the stuff life is made of")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

point taken, and I agree. It really is a "Suicide of Marlboro Man" sort of thing.


503 posted on 05/31/2006 3:05:41 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Now we can move on to helmet laws for bikers and rile up some more people. Or as we refer to them at work, 'DonorCycles'. (organ donation)


504 posted on 05/31/2006 3:06:54 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

>>If you take a stupid risk...then I will pay with taxes for your choice.<<

Gee, thanks. So you also get to tell me what I can and can't do.

I don't really like that arrangement.


505 posted on 05/31/2006 3:08:30 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
I also voted against it and saw the hypocrisy. I was completely dumbfounded when it passed.

And then I waited. 2 years following its passage, boom....tickets were flowing.

It did take about 15 years to go nationwide, but with our rat and pubbie brotherhood securely entrenched and owned by the insurance lobby, it was just a matter of time till the instruction manual for this law was passed around.
506 posted on 05/31/2006 3:08:47 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
I'm with you on this J.S.P1.

We have some newbies aboard, who have only been with us about 8 months or so, and have missed a lot of this discussion on this forum in years passed.

507 posted on 05/31/2006 3:09:34 PM PDT by capt. norm (Ben Franklin: "Does thou love life? Then do not squander time; for that's the stuff life is made of")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Each of us owns himself...

End of argument. People either agree with this statement or disagree with it, either decision has consequences.

Some argue about higher insurance rates while others argue about greater state control over the individual. As for me, I'll take the higher rates if it means individual liberty. So, who owns me, freepers? Am I owned by society or myself?

508 posted on 05/31/2006 3:12:12 PM PDT by Live and let live conservative (Capitalism: It works, give it a try America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tokra

That is not always true - there have been cases of people injured by a body being rocketed through a windshield becasue they were not belted in. Just because the article ignores certain facts does not make them vanish.



Such preposterously rare events do not legitimize police stopping people and taking their money for not wearing a seatbelt.


509 posted on 05/31/2006 3:12:50 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression

Fine Bubba, you win seat belts have no value, they are a hoax, they are nothing more than a tool put in cars to amplify the governments pocket book.



I never uttered or implied such a moronic notion. It's all yours.


510 posted on 05/31/2006 3:13:46 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

"Old friends know where you've been, New friends know where you're going" -- Bob Segar. :-)


511 posted on 05/31/2006 3:14:58 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Very interesting phrase on the Marlboro Man.


512 posted on 05/31/2006 3:15:06 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Illegal Aliens....STFU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression

Seat belts do help and that is a fact you cannot ignore and remain honest. Debating the enforcment of them is fair but all i see form you is opposition without solution. I see you present a differing position on ages between 5 to 17 but that is as in depth as you go. That to me makes it appear that you are afraid to say that you personally think it is a bogus law and that is a good enough reason for you to ignore it.



You are getting loony. Who are you arguing with?

Reading my posts make it clear that I wear seatbelts, I support others wearing seatbelts, but I oppose cops pulling people other for choosing otherwise.


513 posted on 05/31/2006 3:15:48 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
You're wrong - when you come flying through your windshield at 70 mph and crash into MY windshield you have just compromised MY safety through YOUR stupidity.


How about some evidence to support this scenario that you use to justify stopping and fining otherwise law-abiding citizens who are otherwise harming no one?

If we let such silly imagined scenarios justify police intrusion, where do you think the government power zealots would take us?
514 posted on 05/31/2006 3:17:56 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression

Nothing in the post you whined about regarding your kids. Just a picture of sheep.


515 posted on 05/31/2006 3:20:19 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy; JoeSixPack1

Its not what I WANT to do...it is how our society is at present.It is reality. If you don't like it, change those laws.

You take a risk and end up injured for life. We all pay taxes to take care of you...no individual insurance will cover that care for the rest of your life.

Now, if you want a brain damaged person who drove his cycle without a helmet to be out on the street..no benefits, no medical care...well, then you've got "freedom". Oh, and that is not socialism.


516 posted on 05/31/2006 3:20:51 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (Illegal Aliens....STFU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression; elkfersupper
Bubba by 'some on this thread' I meant posters not posts.


So, you are claiming that Elk made the outrageous claims elsewhere.

Considering what you dishonestly claim I advocate, I don't believe Elk said such a thing.
517 posted on 05/31/2006 3:22:54 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

True. Consider however the catastrophic fund bank the state has.

Vehicle Insurance Cost Increase — As the result of the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Fund running a deficit, the cost of automobile insurance attributable to these types of claims will increase 11.4% to $141.70 effective July 1, 2005. This Fund pays health insurance costs in excess of $350,000 and is currently paying out some $50 million monthly. This cost is built into the insurance rates companies charge for automobile insurance. The Claims Fund Association is a statutorily created private, non-profit entity.

http://www.mi-sera.org/lr/2005/0405.html

No tickets, accidents, claims, living in suburbia, 2 adult drivers, one 4 year old minivan, and I'm paying $1,400 a year for ins. and that is cheap here. So 10% of my rate goes to protecting other peoples 'right'. Don't make sense dude!


518 posted on 05/31/2006 3:22:56 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
If we let such silly imagined scenarios justify police intrusion, where do you think the government power zealots would take us?

Exactly! This is what they are trying to pull of with global warming.

I just read another post from MSNBC where the current scare story is that global warming will help poison ivy grow to huge proportions.

Those exact same conditions that would cause that would also allow the world's food crops to grow likewise, but you will never hear that from them. They put their "liberal filter" on all the news and this is the result.

519 posted on 05/31/2006 3:24:15 PM PDT by capt. norm (Ben Franklin: "Does thou love life? Then do not squander time; for that's the stuff life is made of")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"Privilege" is a cute word, but it is meaningless unless you tell us the principles under which the privilege can and can not be revoked. Once you do that, you have a "right", subject to responsibilities. Just like speech and bearing arms.

Excellent. You said it better than I could.

520 posted on 05/31/2006 3:24:21 PM PDT by Tolkien (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 661-670 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson