To: Know your rights
Who did that? This judge merely applied a well established (albeit conceptually flawed) evidentiary principle. The judge
He merely released two more predators back into the social pool to eat more fish. Some will applaud him for it.
To: af_vet_1981
He merely released two more predators back into the social pool to eat more fish. Some will applaud him for it. Wong, the judge RIGHTLY surpressed ILLEGALLY obtained evidence. That's exactly the kind of thing we should applaud.
71 posted on
06/04/2006 6:20:40 PM PDT by
Melas
(What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
To: af_vet_1981
Using the color of one's skin to excuse criminal behaviorWho did that?
The judge
Wrong; as I said, this judge merely applied a well established (albeit conceptually flawed) evidentiary principle. (Free clues: it's called the "exclusionary rule" and this judge didn't invent it.)
81 posted on
06/04/2006 7:19:34 PM PDT by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson