Posted on 05/29/2006 6:36:39 AM PDT by DogByte6RER
Boycott of Fox a protest
By: RAY HAYNES - Commentary
The president of Mexico, Vicente Fox, spoke to the California Legislature on Thursday; this while the U.S. Senate was voting on an immigration bill. I chose not to go to the Fox speech. Since many people may misconstrue what occurred, I believe a statement explaining my actions is needed.
I have been in the Legislature for some time, and I have seen many heads of state pass through. The American republic and its operations are fascinating to these foreign politicians, and addressing the California Legislature is often a high point in many dignitaries' travels. Appropriate decorum dictates that we as legislators be polite and treat these visitors with the respect their positions deserve.
However, most of these dignitaries are visiting our country to see it at work, and to talk with government officials to help their businesses trade with businesses in California, or to establish some sort of government to government relationship. They are not usually in this country, and in our state, to lobby Congress or the state for a change in policy.
Fox's trip had no other purpose. He was in this country addressing legislative bodies for the sole purpose of trying to change U.S. immigration policy. He has continually complained about our policy, openly questioned the legality of President Bush putting National Guard units on the border, and even complained when Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the bill which would have given California driver's licenses to illegal immigrants.
Throughout the last several years, he has encouraged his citizens to immigrate to this country illegally, and has, in many ways, benefited from that illegal immigration. When his citizens come to California, our taxpayers pick up their medical bills, pay for their education, food, clothing and housing. In return, these Mexican citizens usually take most of their earnings and send them back to Mexico. The relationship is all to Mexico's benefit, and not much help to California.
So when Fox came to California to promote amnesty for the Mexican nationals that have broken our laws, I found his presence here to be arrogant and offensive. Many of the Mexican citizens who come to the United States illegally are the social problems of Mexico.
The corruption, the favoritism, the oppressive government has left many of these people in abject poverty, and, if they didn't come to the United States, they would probably start a revolution in Mexico. Fox wants us to relieve the political tension that these social problems would cause.
So why should I sanction this visit? Why should I sit and listen to lies and propaganda meant to influence the legislative passage of a bill in Congress with which I vehemently disagree? We need to enforce our laws first, not listen to the president of Mexico ask us to pay for his social problems. He should go back to Mexico, fix his economy, fix his corrupt government and quit sending us his social problems.
I couldn't say that to him because he would not meet with us to hear these words. So I greeted him with silence. It wasn't disrespectful. It was protest. It is how I would treat any lobbyist who was pushing me to do something I thought was wrong. More important, it was wrong of the leadership of the California Legislature to aid and abet his lobbying effort.
I wasn't going to sanction it at any level, so I left, and encouraged others to do the same. It was the right thing to do.
Ray Haynes represents the 66th Assembly District, which includes portions of Western Riverside County and Northern San Diego County.
Thanks Ray wherever you are this Memorial day.
Send Rep. Hayes to the Senate.
Well said.
Absolutely! I didn't know that there are any CA politicians left out there with that much common sense and principle. He should run for the US Senate or at least for a Congressional seat.
I note the civility and rational discourse Mr. Haynes offers and contrast it with what I see coming from the left all the time.
We should be lobbying the House to hold firm on the "amnesty bill".
There is no reason to even address that side of the problem.
We should build the wall and enforce the border, enforce our laws, make it more difficult to create/use fraudulent IDs, and stop all benefits being provided to illegals.
We don't have to deport 11 million people. Stop giving them jobs and freebies, and they will leave.
What I would like to have addressed is no foreign leader can come and speak to elected officials about overturning our own laws in favor of giving preference to said foreign government in preference of the citizens of the U. S. of America.
And if they cause trouble here, too bad.
I thought he was in town to recieve the key to the WH.
Fox ought to be trying to make his country less of a cesspool.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.