Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why cigs? Why not beef?The vagaries of the precautionary principle
Toronto Star ^ | May 28, 2006 | CHRISTINE SISMONDO

Posted on 05/28/2006 8:39:31 PM PDT by tbird5

On Wednesday, Toronto smokers will be forced off the minuscule pieces of public real estate to which they still have access: designated, separately ventilated smoking rooms, cigar bars and, to most everyone's surprise, many outdoor patios.

The Ontario-wide legislation expanded last month to include the great outdoors, making it one of the most aggressive anti-smoking laws in Canada.

Smoking will be prohibited on patios with any sort of awning, any kind of built-in overhang (even when it is a permanent feature of the building), or even when patio umbrellas are deemed to be too close together.

Bar owners, let me tell you, are sick and tired of this particular discussion.

Let me relate their basic position, since they have a point:

As the polar ice caps melt, as bird flu pandemic looms, as Canada just had its fifth case of mad cow disease, Ontario's latest contribution to the safety of the world is to send inspectors around measuring spaces in between patio umbrellas to make sure that no tiny whiff of smoke might be momentarily trapped underneath an overlap, threatening the health of some innocent, pristine lung underneath.

Has that whiff of smoke ever been proven to dart down, infiltrate the lung and cause untold damage? All the studies on passive smoking are inconclusive. It may well be bad for us. We just don't know for sure.

But smoking laws in Ontario have been designed in accordance with the "precautionary principle," an up-and-coming legal doctrine that holds potentially harm-causing agents guilty before they are proven innocent.

(Excerpt) Read more at thestar.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 1984ishere; antismokingnazis; bigbrother; goodbyefreedom; policestate; pufflist

1 posted on 05/28/2006 8:39:32 PM PDT by tbird5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tbird5

When the Communist, government thugs start banning smoking OUTSIDE, it's no longer about that mythical "second-hand smoke." It's something else.


2 posted on 05/28/2006 8:44:37 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Freedom or a baloney sandwich? A DemocRAT will ALWAYS choose the baloney sandwich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Yup, don't forget your barstool safety belt either.


3 posted on 05/28/2006 9:12:20 PM PDT by umgud (FR, NASCAR & 24, way too much butt time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tbird5

Make 'em wear a scarlet S. The Left are the neo-Puritans of the 21st century.


4 posted on 05/28/2006 9:13:08 PM PDT by Savage Beast (The Spirit of Flight 93 is the Spirit of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Gabz; Mears

PING!


5 posted on 05/28/2006 9:13:11 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

We are living in a world gone mad.


6 posted on 05/28/2006 9:16:27 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

"But earlier this year, the Canadian-beef-banning French government backed down from a proposed smoking ban. Parisians can still smoke until they're blue in the face on Rue Saint Germain. "




Looks like we smokers will be spending our tourist dollars in France.


7 posted on 05/28/2006 9:19:39 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tbird5
.....the "precautionary principle," an up-and-coming legal doctrine that holds potentially harm-causing agents guilty before they are proven innocent.

Once the "precautionary principle" takes hold and is applied to things such as technology, medicine, farming, "global warming", trade, and everything else we're all f***ed.

It's the perfect liberal idea because it creates the very problem it's supposed to correct by causing irreversible and unpredictable consequences.
8 posted on 05/28/2006 9:20:38 PM PDT by Jaysun (Cold showers turn me on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Amen. That has to be one of the dumbest laws I've ever read (well, next to our new Senate immigration "proposal" maybe).


9 posted on 05/28/2006 9:24:41 PM PDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
Once the "precautionary principle" takes hold and is applied to things such as technology, medicine, farming, "global warming", trade, and everything else we're all f***ed.

Big bump.

It has not really reached the public consciousness, but that term -- "precautionary principle" -- is the new face and weapon of leftwing socialist activism. If you did not like what happened when they discovered the weapon of judicial activism, you really won't like how they are planning on using this meme.

In short, it is the idea that no new technology of any type can be researched or developed without express permission from a regulatory body first. All science and research is forbidden unless explicitly allowed, assuming it supports a broader social and "ethical" agenda supported by the government(s). You will have to "prove" that such research and science supports their ideology and agenda, or you will not be allowed to do it. They desire absolute control over technological development so that they can steer certain outcomes.

This should scare the bejeezus out of anyone that cares about the future, as it would absolutely destroy what is left of the country. Anyone that adopts or uses the "precautionary principle" as a guiding political philosophy is ipso facto evil. This is on the horizon, and many people will find its specious reasoning seductive. It must be crushed at all costs, for the sake of the human race.

10 posted on 05/28/2006 9:37:17 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tbird5
It's surprising to see such a sensible article in the Toronto Star.

The latest restrictions won't have any health benefits whatsoever.

So far, the "precautionary principle&quote+ in practice means paying an immense insurance premium just "in case" some paranoiac moonbat's doomsday scenario comes to pass.

Maybe the "precautionary principle" needs to be applied more widely -- to some previously overlooked scenarios. Here are some possibilities:

* drill ANWAR just "in case" hostile regimes withhold supplies;
* preemptively invade Iran and N. Korea just "in case" they go nuclear; * preemptively invade Syria, just "in case" they're not paying attention; * build a fence along the Mexican border, just "in case" uncontrolled illegal immigration erodes security;
* tap calls to Muslim countries just "in case" there's a terrorist on the line;
* etc.
11 posted on 05/28/2006 10:56:02 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; ...

12 posted on 05/29/2006 3:14:13 AM PDT by SheLion ("If you're legal, you can fly with the Eagle!" - Michael Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
This should scare the bejeezus out of anyone that cares about the future, as it would absolutely destroy what is left of the country. Anyone that adopts or uses the "precautionary principle" as a guiding political philosophy is ipso facto evil. This is on the horizon, and many people will find its specious reasoning seductive. It must be crushed at all costs, for the sake of the human race.

It's hard to describe the implications of such an idea without sounding like a deranged nut. It really is the most dangerous scheme ever imagined. Europe has already started to embrace it.
13 posted on 05/29/2006 3:30:42 AM PDT by Jaysun (Cold showers turn me on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; RandallFlagg; Mears

Big Brother is measuring the distance between patio table umbrellas....... Soon to be measuring the one on your back porch.


"We are living in a world gone mad."

I think mears summed it up pretty well.


14 posted on 05/29/2006 5:33:43 AM PDT by 383rr ((those who choose security over liberty deserve neither; GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Thanks for the ping!


15 posted on 05/29/2006 7:36:09 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson