White House Letter: Like it or not, Bush III is being primed to run

IHT ^

[paulat]

If you vote 3rd party, you will at least be sending a message that might prove effective.

Yep...all you Perot-people!!! LOSERS!!!

[Jameison]

"American has had enough of the BUSHIES."

Tell that to the Klintons.

[rolling_stone]

I'd take Jeb over Hitlery any day, any time

And why would we even be thinking of such a choice? Is the fix in?

[Lunatic Fringe]

Not very effective at all... then again, how effective was the 3rd party candidacy of little known Congressman named Abraham Lincoln?

[Hop A Long Cassidy]

>>>If the man repudiates "compassionate conservatism" I'll give him a look see.

"Read my lips, no new taxes."

Read my lips, "this is not an amnesty."

Words are cheap.

[FairOpinion]

Jeb Bush did everything he could to save Terri -- he was going as far as trying to rescue Terri, but someone alerted the nursing home.

Put the blame where it belongs on the Mike Schiavo, Greer and the FL Legislature.

[Jameison]

"Perhaps Jeb Bush is innocent of Terri's death"

There's no way I am blaming Jeb for Terri's death.
He strove mightily to save her.
Blame that rabid liberal judge, and Terri's evil husband.

[GSlob]

Impossible. If they clean the wax out of their ears, what passes for their brains will immediately fall out.

[FairOpinion]

And why don't you quote what Hillary would say?!

[Jameison]

Great minds. :)

[org.whodat]

Or do you want McCain as the Republican nominee and Hillary as president?

When the only thing you have to sell is fear you've reached bottom.

[Uriah_lost]

It's douche...

[Jameison]

"And why would we even be thinking of such a choice?"

Because Hitelry is determined to run in 2008 and probably 2012 whether he wins or not?
Think Hanoi John , John Edwards and Algore.

[TomGuy]

Enough.

The 2 who've already served in the WH haven't been that outstanding.

Surely, out of 300,000,000 people, we can find someone outside the Bush family.

[rolling_stone]

And why don't you quote what Hillary would say?!

I'll let you do that, you sem to be familiar with all the libs...but I will give you a start:

Clinton 1 It all depends on the meaning of the word"is"

[rolling_stone]

Because Hitelry is determined to run in 2008 and probably 2012 whether he wins or not? Think Hanoi John , John Edwards and Algore.

So what does that have to do with GOP putting up Jeb?

[Young Scholar]

I never said I supported Perot, or even advocated voting 3rd party instead of Republican.

Some say that of all basic skills, reading comprehension is most strongly correlated with intelligence. For your sake, you'd better hope that isn't true.

[Jameison]

"So what does that have to do with GOP putting up Jeb?"

Back to what I said before, if Hitelry, why not Jeb?
Jeb is much more qualified to be President than she is, and she is only NY Senator because of her husband.
Try getting some housewife from Arkansas to stand for Senator for New York and see where that gets ya.

[seowulf]

Just how "effective" was the message of people who voted for Perot and gave us Clinton?

Pretty effective when you consider the Clintons gave the R's the House and Senate after decades.

[supercat]

Just how "effective" was the message of people who voted for Perot and gave us Clinton?

Quite, actually. The Republicans saw that they had to come up with a real message if they wanted to win America's votes, so they did. Unfortunately, after their big win in 1994, they started worrying too much on "going after" Clinton, when Clinton was in fact going along with most of what the Republicans asked for.

Many people despise Clinton, and with good reason, but he was nowhere near as leftist as people claim. He was more interested in his illicit relations than in stopping the Republicans; the Republicans should have taken advantage of this. Instead, they managed to shoot themselves in the feet consistently and repeatedly.