Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where's the Outrage Over William Jefferson?
Human Events ^ | May 24, 2006 | Chris Field

Posted on 05/28/2006 2:23:49 PM PDT by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
I didn't see it posted.

Indeed, where is the outrage? Why aren't people demanding that he resign???

1 posted on 05/28/2006 2:23:51 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Anyone else have a hard time not saying "Clinton" after saying "William Jefferson?" I sure do. Maybe it's because Clinton was the first Black President.


2 posted on 05/28/2006 2:25:09 PM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

There is another article which very clearly explains the legality of the search.

Congress Isn't Above the Law. And bribery isn't "speech or debate."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1639582/posts

"Based upon such compelling evidence and Mr. Jefferson's refusal to comply with a subpoena to surrender key documents for eight months, a federal judge issued the search warrant that was executed in the congressman's Capitol Hill office last weekend. The FBI took exceptional measures to ensure that no privileged documents would be surrendered to investigators, with any close calls being made by a federal judge.

The "Speech or Debate" clause is contained in Article I, Section 6, which provides that members of Congress "shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place." The provision was designed to protect legislators from civil law suits and unwarranted harassment by the executive branch, such as charges of defamation stemming from criticisms of the president during congressional debate. Put simply, only Congress can inquire into the motives or content of votes, speeches or other official legislative acts.

But as the Supreme Court observed in the 1972 case of U.S. v. Brewster, the clause was never intended to immunize corrupt legislators who violate felony bribery statutes--laws that have expressly applied to members of Congress for more than 150 years. In Brewster, the court noted the clause was not written "to make Members of Congress super-citizens, immune from criminal responsibility," adding: "Taking a bribe is, obviously, no part of the legislative process or function; it is not a legislative act. It is not, by any conceivable interpretation, an act performed as a part of or even incidental to the role of a legislator."

Such behavior is therefore not protected by the Constitution. The purpose of the Speech or Debate Clause was to protect the integrity of the legislative process, and the court noted that bribery, "perhaps even more than Executive power," would "gravely undermine legislative integrity and defeat the right of the public to honest representation."


3 posted on 05/28/2006 2:26:49 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Why not visit everyone's office over a three day weekend. :-)


4 posted on 05/28/2006 2:27:03 PM PDT by Doc Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

?


5 posted on 05/28/2006 2:28:39 PM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 ( http://cannoneerno4.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Hunter

You seems to have missed that the FBI has OVERWHELMING evidence, PROBABLY cause, they got a legal warrant. And did you know that Jefferson was served with a subpoena, which he ignored for 8 months -- it was after all that, when his office was searched, WITH a warrant.



"According to numerous press accounts, after videotaping Mr. Jefferson receiving a $100,000 bribe from an FBI informant, the government executed a search warrant of his home and found $90,000 of that money hidden in his freezer. In another case, a Kentucky businessman pleaded guilty to paying Mr. Jefferson $400,000 in bribes for official favors; and one of the congressman's key staff members has already entered a guilty plea to aiding and abetting the bribery of a public official.

Based upon such compelling evidence and Mr. Jefferson's refusal to comply with a subpoena to surrender key documents for eight months, a federal judge issued the search warrant that was executed in the congressman's Capitol Hill office last weekend."

CONGRESS ISN'T ABOVE THE LAW
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008439


6 posted on 05/28/2006 2:29:24 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Nevermind that the search found cash wrapped in foil and hidden in the congressman’s freezer. Nevermind that at least two associates of the Democrat lawmaker have pled guilty to bribing the congressman.

New DNC spokeswoman: Emily Litella.

7 posted on 05/28/2006 2:29:31 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; kstewskis
I understand the Republicans’ being upset over the search of a congressional office by the Justice Department.

I don't understand. It seems that if a congress critter broke the law, the outrage lies this person's feet.

No wonder Republicans are starting to lose faith in the people they sent to Capital Hill.

8 posted on 05/28/2006 2:30:12 PM PDT by Northern Yankee ( Stay The Course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Why, don't you know that Democrats are innocent? Those who are members of the CBC are particularly innocent of everything.


9 posted on 05/28/2006 2:30:29 PM PDT by Clara Lou (A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Hunter

Wasn't there a "shootist" in that joint Friday and there were cops running around all over that place looking for him? LOL!


10 posted on 05/28/2006 2:31:05 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Freedom or a baloney sandwich? A DemocRAT will ALWAYS choose the baloney sandwich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
That's pretty simple to answer... Where's the rage over OJ Simpson

Where's the rage over Bill Campbell, Former Atlanta Mayor (only got convicted of Income Tax evasion and not for the vast sums he took in bribes)?

Where's the rage over the Duke LaCrosse players being railroaded by a black DA?

Where's the rage over prosecutions on Hate Crimes for whites-on-blacks only?

The rest will fill a book, but it's pointless. It's a horse of a different color that apparently can't do wrong. We've come to accept that kind of behavior because of white guilt for past sins.

11 posted on 05/28/2006 2:32:07 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Keep in mind that to criticize William Jefferson (D - La) opens one to be labeled a racist. That and one must remember that he is a member in good standing of the RAT party, hence the hands off treatment from those dinsaurs in the msm.


12 posted on 05/28/2006 2:32:59 PM PDT by Howie66 ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Well, William Jefferson Clinton must've made off with Outrage earlier, along with making out with her.


13 posted on 05/28/2006 2:36:18 PM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The New York Times has a cover story today highlighting the great divide between House GOPers and the Bush White House over the FBI’s search of Democrat Rep. William Jefferson’s (La.) Capitol Hill office last weekend.

Nevermind that the search found cash wrapped in foil and hidden in the congressman’s freezer.

I don't think this is quite true, is it? I thought the cash was in his DC home.

14 posted on 05/28/2006 2:36:28 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Where's the outrage? Right here, me. So what, big deal, who cares?

I am beside myself over the administration and the party failure to make the Dog nmad liberals squeal like the pigs that they are. Hell, the GOP sounds more like leftists than the conservative party.

GWB can know that he is doing right when he is being denounced on all issues by the left. The dorsally moist need to fly South for ever or languish in jail. Leftist-scofflaws must join them.


15 posted on 05/28/2006 2:38:35 PM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Nevermind that the search found cash wrapped in foil and hidden in the congressman’s freezer.

I don't think this is quite true, is it? I thought the cash was in his DC home.


====

It didn't say it was in his freezer in his office, just "congressman's freezer" -- his freezer at home is still "the congressman's freezer". And not to mention that they videotaped him accepting a $100K bribe in cash.


16 posted on 05/28/2006 2:38:48 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I don't think the office search found the money in the freezer, that was in his house.

CBS expressed a little bit of outrage, but called Jefferson a REPUBLICAN representative.


17 posted on 05/28/2006 2:39:32 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"Where's the Outrage Over William Jefferson? "

He's a STINKING RAT...ENUFF said! RAT CRIMINALS slide while the pubs usually are BURNED AT THE STAKE!...Ask DeLay!

18 posted on 05/28/2006 2:40:29 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I see your point.

But one correction:

"Where's the rage over the Duke LaCrosse players being railroaded by a black DA?"

The DA is NOT black.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/060518/480/30546545c78a4415a02c6ab13b999ccc


19 posted on 05/28/2006 2:42:46 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Where are those people who demanded Republicans resign? I hope somebody in the media will pose that question to them.


20 posted on 05/28/2006 2:43:18 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson