[DBeers]

I can not disagree philosophically. However, practically speaking, we must deal must deal with the world as we find it, not as we wish it were, or “should be.” Therefore, my assessment remains:

Logical argument may be used to deal with and accept the world as one finds it or may be used to assess and point out errors to correct such that the world might be what it should be...

To remain germane to opposing the homosexual agenda one must step outside the box homosexual activists or those supporting such define...

[Lucky Dog]

Perhaps we have failure to communicate. My point was that the APA and a significant number of homosexual practitioners have resisted the classification of homosexual activity as a mental disorder.

Consequently, my point was that to be successful in opposing homosexual activity, one must either convince the APA, et al, to change their position or attack the practice on different grounds. As an example, rather that directly asserting that homosexual behavior is a mental disorder, the indirect approach would be to logically show that it can not be otherwise though comparison to similar activities.