Skip to comments.
U.N. "Disarming" Iraq from WMD while allowing them WMD???
U.N. Export List to Iraq ^
| May 28, 2006
| avacado
Posted on 05/28/2006 6:59:14 AM PDT by avacado
My subject title doesn't make sense, does it? How coud the U.N. be disarming Iraq from WMD while allowing them WMD at the same time. Is there a 4th dimension of space that I am not aware of?
Chemicals allowed for export to Iraq by other countries:
- Sodium Cyanide
- Hydrogen Cyanide
- Phosgene
Well golly, gee-whiz... those chemicals are WMD with a world history of being used as chemical weapons. The U.N. is a complete joke! They are looking for chemical weapons while allowing Saddam to purchase chemical weapons! Yeah, that's the ticket! Makes good sense to me!
U.N. (Oil-for-Food programme) Goods Review List: http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/S-2002-515.pdf
TOPICS: War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq; iraqiintelligence; prewardocs; prewarintelligence; saddam; terrorism; wmd; wmds; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: Renderofveils; avacado
As of right now, this is a non-issue, unless there's some weird chemical weapons smuggling ring selling phosgene to, say... Iran or Syria. I agree. Iraq and chemical weapons aren't an issue at this point. We have an embassy in Iraq now. And a bunch of military bases.
And Saddam's locked up in an fortress in the Radwaniyah sectio undisclosed location (sorry, but it's the worst-kept secret in Iraq) unless he has to be in court.
21
posted on
05/28/2006 8:02:43 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(Finbar for Texas Governor!)
To: Carry_Okie
The Germans know ALL about Phosgene!
To: avacado
The subject is about the inspections and the chemicals allowed by the U.N. during a 12 year period of disarmament.Want to talk 'red herring'?
When did that 12-year period end?
Why do you think it's important today?
I couldn't care less at this point. Why am I talking to a troll?
Have a nice day.
23
posted on
05/28/2006 8:06:31 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
To: TADSLOS
Hey,that's right,Bush lied!!!
To: avacado
25
posted on
05/28/2006 8:08:51 AM PDT
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: Publius6961
--- Want to talk 'red herring'? When did that 12-year period end? Why do you think it's important today? I couldn't care less at this point. --- I don't really care what YOU want. Understand. I was simply putting forth known chemcials weapons that the UN was allowing Saddam to import at a time when inspectors were in the country looking to destroy chemcial weapons.
As for you, you have issues.
26
posted on
05/28/2006 8:11:26 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: avacado
Raw chemicals that could have been used for the manufacture of chemical weapons should NEVER have been allowed to be shipped to Iraq while Saddam was in power. If the UN was concerned about Iraq having fertilizer (or pesticides) to facilitate crop growth then they should have made arrangements to ship the pre-processed materials to the fields where it was to be applied. Why we as a nation give a penny of support to the UN is beyond my comprehension...
27
posted on
05/28/2006 9:12:19 AM PDT
by
GW and Twins Pawpaw
(Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
To: avacado
The U.N. is a complete joke! This just in... :D
28
posted on
05/28/2006 9:23:05 AM PDT
by
Fruitbat
To: Fruitbat; avacado
This thread is like a time warp.
Where's Hans Blix?
29
posted on
05/28/2006 10:06:05 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(Thread Hijacker Extraordinaire)
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: Carry_Okie
You can use phosgene for 'human plating' but we have no evidence that Saddam ateany of his adversaries.
31
posted on
05/28/2006 12:09:41 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: Allegra
--- This thread is like a time warp. Where's Hans Blix? --- Really? How so? I have never seen posted, nor discussed, the Goods Review List of the U.N.'s regarding Iraq nor have I seen posted, nor discussed, then fact that while the U.N. was searching for chemical weapons Iraq was allowed to import chemical weapons.
Look, if this thread is not your cup of tea, then move along. It's that easy.
32
posted on
05/28/2006 12:24:36 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: DaveLoneRanger
--- I googled Sodium cyanide, and found no healthful use for it on the Wikipedia listing, unless Iraq is big into mining. It's one of the most rapidly-acting poisons. --- Saddam had a past history of using sodium cyanide to manufacture the chemical weapon called tabun.
--- Avacado, good catch. I checked out the PDF and couldn't find quanities listed anywhere. Is there any way of finding that out, I wonder? ---
Countries could freely export to Iraq anything on List A that is less than 10% solution and if more than that concentrate then they were supposed to submit a form to the UN. I believe a company in Finland exported sodium cyanide to Iraq in 2002 without submitting a form to the UN. And since the program was handled by the Oil-for-Food program, we all know how honest that operation was.
33
posted on
05/28/2006 12:30:39 PM PDT
by
avacado
To: MHGinTN
You can use phosgene for 'human plating' but we have no evidence that Saddam ateany of his adversaries. Phosgene is an intermediate chemical in the production of pesticides and herbicides.
34
posted on
05/28/2006 12:39:45 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
And of course Saddam needed millions of tons to sustain that massive agricultural infrastructure he operated, planting Iranians.
35
posted on
05/28/2006 12:46:46 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: MHGinTN
And of course Saddam needed millions of tons to sustain that massive agricultural infrastructure he operated, planting Iranians. Millions of tons? Prove it.
36
posted on
05/28/2006 12:55:20 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
Who are you, Ramsey Clark? Where did you check your sense of humor when you clicked on FR today?
37
posted on
05/28/2006 1:02:26 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: MHGinTN
Hyperbole is not debate. The point is that dual use can only be verified by inspection and audit. To ban the importation of phosgene, is pointless because it denies how easy it is to produce. To assert that a country with a large ag and chemical base should be incapable of manufacturing phosgene is equally silly. They could simply overheat vinyl to get loads of it. I doubt anyone was suggesting that Iraq under OFF should have been incapable of importing vinyl goods. It's silly, and it's therefore understandable why the UN blew off direct import controls, preferring to audit weapons production and storage.
Thus in no way am I saying that Saddam was no threat to use phosgene for WMD. What I am saying is that blowing off control of its import is not prima facae evidence that the UN is approving of their manufacture.
38
posted on
05/28/2006 1:11:31 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Allegra
Where's Hans Blix? Perhaps Scott Ritter, Jacques Chirac, and Slick Willie needed a 4th for bridge. :) This whole thread has been rather silly.
39
posted on
05/28/2006 1:56:37 PM PDT
by
Gorobei
To: Renderofveils; Carry_Okie; avacado
Now if Saddam's acquitted of all charges and he reclaims his former position, we've got a serious problem.
Saddam is NOT getting out of an Iraqi jail with his skin....sorry if that blows up your theory, but it just won't happen. Beyond that, the Saudis and the Kuwaitis want a piece of him once the Iraqis are done.
40
posted on
05/28/2006 1:59:09 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(aka MikeinIraq)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson