[Copernicus]

Because, contrary to what everyone here seems to "know," there really is a fundamental balance of power issue here.

Thank you for the attempt to insert a small note of sanity in a Free Republic thread.

Unlikely to bear much fruit,however.

Best regards,

[don-o]

Unlikely to bear much fruit,however.

Your larger point? If I am reading the SCOTUS correctly (post 57) Hasert has no leg to stand on.

[statered]

I agree there is a balance of power issue - that of the legislative branch making themselves immune to the other branches.

[cake_crumb]

"Thank you for the attempt to insert a small note of sanity in a Free Republic thread."

Oddly enough, to most of us on this thread - judging by most of the posts - it goes without saying that there's a balance of power stuggle, and the legislative branch is the one that weighed their side of the scale with illegal cash while threatening to lighten law enforcements side by cutting funding.

[Fudd Fan]

Thank you for the attempt to insert a small note of sanity in a Free Republic thread

B Knotts does that a lot. Such voices of reason can't afford to be silenced here these days.