Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Threats Followed FBI Search of Congressman's Office
AP via Fox News ^ | Saturday, May 27, 2006 | Fox News

Posted on 05/28/2006 6:35:29 AM PDT by MNJohnnie

WASHINGTON — The constitutional showdown that followed the FBI's search of a congressman's office came down to this: The House threatened budgetary retaliation against the Justice Department. Justice officials raised the prospect of resigning.

That scenario, as described Saturday by a senior administration official, set the stage for President Bush's intervention into the fight over the FBI's search of the office of Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., an eight-term lawmaker being investigated on bribery allegations.

During contentious conversations between the Department of Justice and the House, top law enforcement officials indicated that they'd rather quit than return documents FBI agents, armed with a warrant, seized in an overnight search of Jefferson's office, the administration official said.

Until last Saturday night, no such warrant had ever been used to search a lawmaker's office in the 219-year history of the Congress. FBI agents carted away records in their pursuit of evidence that Jefferson accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in exchange for helping set up business deals in Africa.

After the raid, House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill, lodged a protest directly with Bush, demanding that the FBI return the materials. Bush struck a compromise Thursday, ordering that the documents be sealed for 45 days until congressional leaders and the Justice Department agree on what to do with them.

(Story continues below)

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; bastert; corruption; criminalcongress; dogandponyshow; govwatch; hastert; williamjefferson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-375 next last
To: Joe 6-pack

You almost have it...add in selling state secrets to foreign governments...


41 posted on 05/28/2006 7:01:30 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The House threaten to cut off funds???

Great! Then the President can refuse to provide federal security of any kind for House members, and stop all briefings of Congress on matters of defense or intelligence, both foreign and domestic. Bring it on you corrupt cossaks!

42 posted on 05/28/2006 7:02:19 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
Because, contrary to what everyone here seems to "know," there really is a fundamental balance of power issue here.

It would seem that this has never come up before because no Congressman had ever pushed it this far, by refusing to cooperate with a legitimate criminal investigation. I think this is because Jefferson knows that he can be a crook and still be reelected by using the race card.

43 posted on 05/28/2006 7:02:25 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
"It's been a very long time since I've seen principle like this in government. These guys deserve serious public plaudit."

Agreed 100%. Before I heard about the threat to withhold funding I respected and applauded their stand. Now that respect and applause are tripled.

44 posted on 05/28/2006 7:03:26 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Drugs? Illegals? Legalize and Tax 'Em All, Right? Right??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Right. And that's why we're where we are with regard to this search. When congressmen say this never happened before, I would imagine it's because no one other Congressman refused a subpoena.

They are full of it. In 1972 there was a court ruling(because of a similar case) that specifically states that the congress can be searched and the debate clause is not aimmunity clause. If this has never happened before why is there a court ruling that speicfically addresses the problem?

45 posted on 05/28/2006 7:04:46 AM PDT by calex59 (No country can survive multiculturalism. Dual cultures don't mix, history has taught us that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I'm a pretty optimistic gal by nature- but what I'm seeing now is truly beyond anything I can remember since the Viet Nam years. The disconnect is alarming.

What brought it into focus was hearing Rush discussing what McCain told a gathering of GOP fundraisers last week (paraphrasing)..that if it weren't for the likes of Rush, Lou Dobbs, etc..this bill would pass easily into law. What's SO sickening here- is that McCain does not realize that Rush, Dobbs etc are simply EDUCATING listeners to facts..facts McCain and his gang have obviously not WANTED the American public to know.

On Memorial Day weekend it seems we mourn our lost country as well as those lost in battle.


46 posted on 05/28/2006 7:04:58 AM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

Bought himself another 45 days, at least.

Or should I say "Hastert provided for him"


47 posted on 05/28/2006 7:04:59 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
As usual, the morally-bankrupt Congress is pissed off that their guy got caught. Funny how Duke Cunningham's bust didn't set off this kind of firestorm.

After the raid, House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill, lodged a protest directly with Bush, demanding that the FBI return the materials.

Hmmm, I wonder what the DemonRats have on Denny Hastert. His FBI file must've been interesting reading for Billary and the congressional DemonRat brass.

48 posted on 05/28/2006 7:05:09 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
he documents siezed had been asked for in a subpoena for over nine months. Jefferson was refusing to turn them over.

So according to Hastert, a Congressman under investigation can hide documents in his office?

49 posted on 05/28/2006 7:05:45 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"...none of these (DOJ) guys ever said to the White House that they were going to take that action," the official said, playing down any implication that the threatened resignations were the reason the president decided to seal the documents."

An interesting tidbit for those who claim that the DOJ was "threatening the President" with resignations.

50 posted on 05/28/2006 7:06:22 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

I think Hastert has 434 colleagues that think the same way


51 posted on 05/28/2006 7:07:07 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Peach

When it's a regular citizen, it's okay to burn his house down with him inside while the federal marshalls and fire department sit there and watch.


52 posted on 05/28/2006 7:07:16 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
"What personal stake does he have in this? Any rumors that he's involved? Or any of his colleagues?"

Or put another way, what secret cash stash is HE hiding in his office?

53 posted on 05/28/2006 7:07:52 AM PDT by cake_crumb (Drugs? Illegals? Legalize and Tax 'Em All, Right? Right??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

It's the GOP just supporting crooks again. I have had enough of both parties.


54 posted on 05/28/2006 7:08:24 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Our Republicans have lost their way.

They don't have a way. The Republicans haven't had a leader in years. The person who should be leading them is too busy trying to make friends with the Democrats. Any time someone appears to begin to lead them many of the other Republicans, with the help of Democrats, manage to drum him out of politics. I'm beginning to think that the party is going to continue to out Dem the Democrats until they become extinct.

55 posted on 05/28/2006 7:10:38 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Well put, SE Mom.


56 posted on 05/28/2006 7:12:44 AM PDT by Peach (DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle; Diogenesis
This SCOTUS decision seems to apply?.

Props to Diogenesis

57 posted on 05/28/2006 7:13:33 AM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

bttt


58 posted on 05/28/2006 7:13:37 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

It looks like July 4 may come early this year, and may God help the Republic.


59 posted on 05/28/2006 7:14:01 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Spying on the little guy, without a warrant, is okay

No one is spying on 'the little guy'.

60 posted on 05/28/2006 7:14:29 AM PDT by Dustbunny (Amazing Grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson