Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmaroneps37
"2006: the year of the Constitution Party?" No, but this talk plus stupid talk from the liberal-tarians about a third party might make things just right for a rat take over.

You're exactly right. Besides, the idea that the Republican Party under George W. Bush doesn't have a strong position on abortion and that the Constitution Party would do better is laughable.

The Constitution Party is, among other things, virtually pacifist regarding the War on Terror. In objective terms regarding their effect, not their intentions, that makes them, as George Orwell said about the pacifists of his day regarding the Axis, objectively pro-Islamofascist.

9 posted on 05/27/2006 4:47:04 AM PDT by mjolnir ("All great change in America begins at the dinner table.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mjolnir
I support the WOT and the troops, but I fear we might be fighting history here. Nationism is on the move in Islam, Russia and China. I see emerging in Islam an Islamic super state and I don't think there is much we can do to stop it. Might be wiser to spend our time defeating Islam here at home (declar Islam a cult and out law it in the usa) and preparing for a real war with the nation of Islam once it arises.

Doing the above might just wake up what's left Europe and Russia. We have two oceans between us and Islam. Europe and Russia don't. When Islam goes to war it will be against them not us. Then maybe they (EU, Russia) will change thier tune about the evil imperalist usa.

Should the usa say screw it and withdraw from the heart of the nation of Islam, the fight will quickly move to Europe, let's see how Europe likes having to carry the load for once.

79 posted on 05/27/2006 8:18:58 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: mjolnir
The Constitution Party is, among other things, virtually pacifist regarding the War on Terror.

The Constitution Party is neither pacifist, nor pro-Islamofacist. A constitution party-led government would have kicked Afghanistan's behind, and the outcome wouldn't have been an Islamic state that imprisioned and threatened to execute a Christian convert.

Would they have gone into Iraq? Probably not. I'll leave it up to you to decide how that whole "depose Saddam Hussein and try and build a middle eastern democracy so we can sway Muslims away from terrorism through prosperity" foreign policy is working out.
110 posted on 05/27/2006 9:58:01 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson