Posted on 05/25/2006 11:37:40 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Cold War Talk Prompts Russian Call for 'World Government' By Faleh Al Hamrani
Translated By Nicolas Dagher
May 7, 2006
Watching America
Russian Foreign Secretary Sergueii Lavrov called for the establishment of a world government, bringing together the United States and Russia. Lavrov's call comes at a time of a chilling of relations between Moscow and Washington and amidst signs of a new Cold War. Moscow is wary of the establishment by America of a front of "New Democracies" in Eastern Europe, Ukraine and Georgia to counter "the Russian Bear," which is powerfully awakening.
In an interview granted to the magazine "Russia in Global Politics," Lavrov said that bringing together a "chorus" of major nations into a world government will eliminate the jockeying for power that creates imbalances. Lavrov was certain that "most countries will welcome such a grouping of leadership."
He also said that there is no place in Russian politics for animosity toward the U.S., and that the basic goals of American and Russian foreign policy were nearly identical. He made clear that the policies of both countries are to create a more secure and predictable world.
From Lavrov's point of view, the political differences between Moscow and Washington are essentially philosophical. He explained that the apparent difference in opinion concerning the emerging international system is due to mutual misunderstanding. He added that this misunderstanding is far less significant than that which existed during the previous era, when there was a "negative stability" between two poles, namely the United States and the Soviet Union.
Lavrov pointed out that "absolute security" cannot be achieved through excessive military superiority, and he pointed out that in special cases, differences in interests are completely natural.
The following excerpt is taken from Anatoly Golitsyn's book Perestroika Deception (pg. 10):
Winter 1986: The essence of the strategy is to introduce a calculated and controlled false democratization and to revive a discredited regime by giving it an attractive aspect and a human face. Its strategic objective is to generate support, good will and sympathy in the West and to exploit this sympathy in the West and to exploit this sympathy in order to shape new attitudes and new political realities which will favour Soviet interests. Another objective is to undercut and isolate traditional political parties and their leaders, particularly the conservatives and the realists in the West. A further objective is to shape new attitudes towards the Strategic Defence Initiative, the budget and the US military and to disarm the United States, basing these new attitudes on the premise that the new regime which has emerged in the USSR is liberal and no longer poses any threat to the United States. Given the surprise aspect of the Soviet Strategy, it may succeed. The possible implications of a failure to understand the essence of this strategy would be damaging to both the United States and Western Europe. The Americans, the West Europeans, their leaders and their military strategists would be influenced and misled by these developments all to the detriment of the national interests of the democracies. The probable impact on the West of such a Soviet revival would be equal to or greater than that of the October Revolution.
The impact would in fact be greater and deeper because it would not be alarming but disarming for the West. The revival would become a significant influence in the political life of the United States and Western Europe. The revival might have a disproportionate influence on the attitudes of the democracies towards their military strategy, the NATO alliance and the Strategic Defence Initiative, all to the detriment of their national interests. It might eventually lead to the realization of the final goal of Soviet strategy, namely the convergence of the capitalist West with the Communist East on Soviet terms and the creation of a World Government as a solution to the arms race and nuclear confrontation.
How about a United Federation of Planets. Lavrov can serve as Ambassador to Uranus.
Well, it is, after all, the next logical step. We've just eliminated borders, so we might as well all be one happy groups of serfs instead of 200 separate groups. Make issuing directives so much easier if you only have to do it once!
LOL!
Hehehe!!!!
Gee, a communist/leftist calling for a world government. Sorry, color me "not shocked," or rather "not even mildly surprised."
If the USA joins Russia to rule the world, I'll start talking like Christopher Lambert (the star of the "Highlander" film). You may thereafter call me, "Igor," and TJ, I'll call you "Ivan."
Or maybe it won't happen to begin with.
Great idea. <sarcasm
Isn't Lavrov speaking before NATO? Click on link to original article to see the picture.
Thanks guys. Never learned how to post pictures--GGG
That is the NATO symbol. Russian nationalists often write conspiracy hypotheses that NATO is out to get them. They see it as their competitor for power.
No thanks. Why should we share?
I wonder what the US response would be to the Russian "offer" if Gore, Kerry or Hillary Clinton were in office? Yikes!
Well that was a complete and utter failure wasn't it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.