Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court may decide case of woman facing deportation
AP ^ | 5/25/06 | GARANCE BURKE

Posted on 05/25/2006 6:10:12 PM PDT by AZRepublican

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - The U.S. Supreme Court may have the final word on whether an immigrant mother must leave her husband and son - both American citizens - and be deported next month to her native Mexico.

Now that the Senate has reached an agreement on immigration reforms, the plight of 31-year-old Myrna Dick could also become part of the contentious debate under way in Washington, her lawyers say.

The government first tried to deport Dick in 2004, charging she lied about her citizenship while crossing the U.S. border. She was pregnant at the time of the deportation order, and a federal judge allowed her to stay, saying her fetus essentially was already a U.S. citizen.

Since then, Dick's lawyers have argued in several federal courts that she never claimed she was a U.S. citizen, but instead told officials she was attempting to enter the country illegally.

Next week, they will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case, and to stay a deportation order that would force her to leave her family by June 10.

"We've put the house on the market, I've requested all my medical records, and we're taking carloads of our things over to the church," said Dick, who has spent most of her life in the U.S. and now lives in the Kansas City suburb of Raymore. "But my husband and I are still hoping that somehow we can stay and fight the case here."

She sees a fraction of hope in a proposal sponsored by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo. The draft bill could allow some illegal immigrants who are married to Americans and have children born in the U.S. to remain in this country.

The proposal would create a new legal step to require the government to review such cases while keeping the best interests of the children in mind.

"There are probably thousands of people in this situation across the country and little boys like Myrna's son have rights," said Danny Rotert, a spokesman for Cleaver. "We have an obligation to protect their rights as well."

Cleaver may introduce the proposal as an amendment when the House-Senate conference committee meets to resolve the differences between the two immigration reform packages passed by Congress, Rotert said.

But unless the high court decides to stop her deportation order, Dick will likely need to return to her home state of Chihuahua, Mexico, while lawmakers wrangle over the contents of a massive immigration overhaul.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Colorado; US: Kansas; US: Missouri; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; deport; deportation; deportdeportdeport; deportdeprt; meanoldconservatives; scotus; sendthemwithher; sympathyweapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: MarcusTulliusCicero
I really think it's Senator Cracker. He's got to be an embarrassment to all those votes in Carolina, don't they have recall down there???
21 posted on 05/25/2006 6:59:13 PM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VOA

Yes, I thought that was quite thought provoking.


22 posted on 05/25/2006 7:02:42 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

"In declining States the leadership intuitively choses the most harmful course of action."- A great historian 1888


23 posted on 05/25/2006 7:07:33 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Seems like the government could have come up with a better case to prosecute than this one, unless of course, they were hoping to use this case as a rallying call for liberal immigration reform.

DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING ! We have a winner!

BTW, this is related to the way bureaucrats assign the lowest budget priority to the items that will generate the most complaints if cut. That way, it will be impossible to cut anything.

24 posted on 05/25/2006 7:28:39 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
"In declining States the leadership intuitively choses the most harmful course of action."- A great historian 1888

Probably related to my observation about bureaucracies (previous post)

25 posted on 05/25/2006 7:29:42 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CrawDaddyCA
I like how the pro-illegal groups pull out the 'tear jerker' stories to justify the crimes of illegal criminals.

Yep. It's called the "compassion trap", and it's used to rationalize everything from late term abortion to securing the "rights" enemy combatant terrorists captured in Afghanistan.

26 posted on 05/25/2006 7:59:24 PM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LaineyDee
"I'm sure Fox would make an exception to allow hubby to work and buy property...NOT."

Why would they want to buy property in Mexico when she's applying for citizenship here?

ncountylee was using whatcha call "sarcasm" to make his point about... oh, never mind.

27 posted on 05/26/2006 7:32:02 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

I understand. I was also using a bit of sarcasm in my response. :)


28 posted on 05/26/2006 8:58:32 AM PDT by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Since she has been here several years, is married to an American and had a kid here, and there are millions of other illeglas they aren' targetting, WHY are they targetting her???

Perhaps to try and discredit people who want to deport illegals, that's why. They are making a trial case of an unusual circumstance and then will apply the result to all the illegals infesting our respective states and plaguing the border.

Don't underestimate the Byzantine thinking of Alberto Gonzales.


29 posted on 05/26/2006 9:10:34 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

at a certain level of mega law firms. Cases are set up for LOSS on appeal in order to establish law outside of the legislative process.

Judges are less expensive than politicians and don't have that pesky voter nusance.


30 posted on 05/26/2006 9:18:21 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson