I'm sorry that you cannot understand what I am saying, but it is not surprising. Here, let me explain it a bit clearer for you.
The cornerstone of Irey's campaign is that Murtha needs to go b/c of his comments on Iraq. However, Forty-three percent of respondents from the region said in a recent Quinnipiac University poll that all troops should be removed from Iraq.
Now Irey's campaign makes no sense to me. Yeah, it resonates on the blogosphere and FR, but not at home, where it counts.
But of course, you knew all that already, didn't you.
"However, Forty-three percent of respondents from the region said in a recent Quinnipiac University poll that all troops should be removed from Iraq."
___________________________________________________________
Please provide the link and internals of the poll you are quoting.
I found these figures, but I am not sure if it is the same poll you cite. Also, any poll that will not furnish their internals is worth less than the other polls, all being worthless, IMO.
In this poll, please note they report that 669 DemonRATS were polled, but give no numbers of Republicans and Independents. Bogus poll.....
___________________________________________________________
From May 2 - 8, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,487 Pennsylvania voters with a margin of error of +/- 2.5 percentage points. The survey includes 669 Democrats with a margin of error of +/- 3.8 percentage points.
Looking at the situation in Iraq:
15 percent of voters say increase U.S. troop levels;
21 percent say keep current troop levels;
24 percent say decrease troop levels;
32 percent say remove all troops.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11379.xml?ReleaseID=911
If that is your understanding of the Irey campaign, you are sadly mistaken. Might I suggest you learn more about her and what she stands for.