Posted on 05/24/2006 6:54:50 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
That's because doing so would violate the plan. And they sure don't wanna do that!
Please help us, Mr. Third World Despot.
"It's clear the purpose is to reach an agreement that can give security, that can give legality, that can give flow to the migrant people," Fox said
As if these "migrant people" are just nomads who have been traveling the same geographical patterns for eons. Not quite. lol
Like a liberal Fox misdirects adeptly, transforming the problem (Illegal Immigration) into something else (humble migratory peoples), Implications follow that if you oppose these "migratory people" then you are a big old bad racist, or perhaps a xenophobe!
Fox, Bush and the Senate are on the same page. It's all about accommodating the illegal. The illegal's security, legality and flow.
They obviously do not represent the interests of America's sovereignty,its citizens or its laws.
The headline only partially describes the situation. The complete header should read:
"Fox: U.S. can't fix immigration problem alone, and we ain't gonna help."
You got it.
Thanks for the document. I will speak in code as this subject seems off limits to any other than people who don't believe their lying eyes. I read 'The New American" every two weeks, cover to cover, and had done so for 15 years. It is the most informative journalism available. In 1975 when I was in medical school, I became aware of these organizations, TLC, Bilderbergers, and Illuminiti. In those days, even worse than today, to speak of David Rockefeller, Zbignew Zebrinski, et.al., brought chides of derision. When Bill Clinton intoned that his most influential professor at college was the author of a very famous, yet limited in print, book, Professor Quiggley, I don't know a single news outlet who placed any stock in it. Yet there it was for any enterprising journalist to reveal. Not a word was spoken. Yet to have questioned this internationalist and Clintons motive for stating so would have marginalized the questioner from the beginning. Bush is cut from the same cloth. It has come down to the nut-cutting, and Bush has chosen his lot. He will have to live with his choice. Unfortunantly, all of us will have to do so.
It's been raining in my area since he got here. Seems appropriate weather to herald Vicente.
Can someone explain why we let this detestible POS in this country in the first place? (Oh yeh, he is Jorge's buddy)
I couldn't have said it better myself. Your statement follows my line of thinking exactly. The "bosses" comment was meant as more of a joke than anything. Maybe wishing it was the way it used to be. I wholeheartedly agree about taking a stand and voting Constitution Party and/or at least a conservative. We'll be hollered at for putting Hillary in the White House but as you point out...it doesn't seem to matter whose in their anymore... they're all the same. I support your thoughts 100%.
I'm afraid that our "leaders" are showing themselves to be no more than D.C. pointmen for various corporate interests. The "guest worker" program is a gift to employers who would love nothing better than an army of low-paid, non-complaining, no-other-options, indentured servants, who then could be gotten rid of after a few years for a new batch.
No concern for the culture or traditions of this country. No concern for a society of free people. No concern for national security, or the economic well-being of our middle and working classes.
Just the deal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.