That's because doing so would violate the plan. And they sure don't wanna do that!
Thanks for the document. I will speak in code as this subject seems off limits to any other than people who don't believe their lying eyes. I read 'The New American" every two weeks, cover to cover, and had done so for 15 years. It is the most informative journalism available. In 1975 when I was in medical school, I became aware of these organizations, TLC, Bilderbergers, and Illuminiti. In those days, even worse than today, to speak of David Rockefeller, Zbignew Zebrinski, et.al., brought chides of derision. When Bill Clinton intoned that his most influential professor at college was the author of a very famous, yet limited in print, book, Professor Quiggley, I don't know a single news outlet who placed any stock in it. Yet there it was for any enterprising journalist to reveal. Not a word was spoken. Yet to have questioned this internationalist and Clintons motive for stating so would have marginalized the questioner from the beginning. Bush is cut from the same cloth. It has come down to the nut-cutting, and Bush has chosen his lot. He will have to live with his choice. Unfortunantly, all of us will have to do so.