Yes. I agree. Which is why one increasingly wonders about the origins of some of these so called "conservatives." And don't tell me that they are all "libertarians," because the libertarians have been here for years, and the site has never experienced this kind of turmoil. I am of the opinion that good percentage of these hypercritical conservatives who are spewing nonesense are DU Trolls.
I have no doubt FR has been infiltrated by: (A) DU trolls and (B) Michael Savage idiots.
Purpose of Group A: Spread dissent.
Purpose of Group B: useful idiots.
I don't think it's DU trolls, necessarily -- most of these disruptors can spell. I DO think there is a conscious effort by the Democrats and their allies in the media to divide Republicans prior to the '06 elections. This has been going on since at least the ports issue -- which calmed down, let's remember, after it became apparent that CHUCK SCHUMER of all people was behind the furor.
The immigration debate follows the same game plan. Disruptors have been having a field day bashing the President over the issue, when any bill must still go through the Senate, the House, and conference before the President even gets a chance to look at it.
No doubt there's a rabble rousing "divide and conquer strategy" at work in the MSM and the 'net, and I'm dumbfounded how many are falling for it -- it's the oldest trick in the book.
Well read my history of comments to find out if I'm a troll. What Hastert did sent me over the edge when he defended Jefferson. And he wants congressional offices off-limits for felony warrants!
It made no sense what-so-ever until the ABC report. Character does matter. Remember we said that about Clinton? And the constitution is the foundation my conservatism is based on. If he thinks it says congress gets to commit felonies and hide in congress...then he's wrong.