Posted on 05/24/2006 2:27:42 PM PDT by Dane
Will have to watch Brit later on tonight, since Tony will be on Mr. Hysterical's(dobb's) show tonight.
It will be an argument of the rational(Snow) vs. the irrational(Dobbs).
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
It will be an argument of the rational(Snow) vs. the irrational(Dobbs).
----
Maybe. And I say that, because Tony's position is not compromised because he must defend Bush's position on every issue -- especially illegal immigration. If Tony had not taken the job, I bet the conversation would be quite different than it will be...
I meant IS COMPROMISED!!! :-)
That's interesting. Anybody remember Scott McClellan EVER being sent to do TV interviews? I don't.
Perhaps because as an air personality your job depends on telling the audience what it wants to hear.
In sept it will be 5 years and the Militant muslims have not made a single additional attack in the united states.
Why?
The answer has to be becuase they can't get what they need into the USA. Anyone with an IQ. larger than their shoe size knows that if an attack made it through the mexican border the border would be closed in hours.
So every mexican who lives high bringing illegals into our nation has a huge motivation to see to it no terrorists make it across. It is not hard. The terrorist either have weapons or the money to buy them before they try to cross. They never make it across the border.
But once we effectively close the border, the only thing those guides for illegal immigrants will have to sell is safe passage for terrorists. They'll get some through perhaps a few hundred.. not millions but hundreds.
If you want to see terrorists cross the mexican border close it to illegal immigrants.
Perhaps your last thought as you die from the explosion wounds will be ..."At least no illegal immigrent Mexican will get to dig my grave."
That's interesting. Anybody remember Scott McClellan EVER being sent to do TV interviews? I don't.
**
Now do we know that Snow is being "sent" by the White House, or he could be appearing voluntarily?
Anyone who agrees with the President's immigration refrom proposal, or perhaps even favors a more open-border approach, is same, rational, compassionate, realistic, and generally has their head screwed on straight.
Anyone who sees it as a sellout is a hysterical, uncaring, anti-business, unpatriotic anti-immigrant racist (who by the way is only saying such things for their own financial gain.
Thanks for all the effort you put into clearing this up for us.
Now he's convinced the world is coming to an end because we're insourcing empoloyees.
Poor guy, it's all bash Bush all the time. Of course, he does have a cohort in Savage and a few other talk show hosts who have jumped on Savage's bandwagon.
Truly the world has gone mad.
"So every mexican who lives high bringing illegals into our nation has a huge motivation to see to it no terrorists make it across."
You're positing that we're dependent upon COYOTES, as far as preventing any sort of terrorist infiltration from south of the border? Huh?
Now he's convinced the world is coming to an end because we're insourcing empoloyees.
Before outsourcing, Dobbs was convinced the US was swirling around the drain because Dennis Kozlowski of Tyco had been buying gold toilet fixtures with the company's money.
Dobbs has this "us" verus "them" schtick down pretty good.
the master....
Are you suggesting that Michael Savage doesn't have all his marbles?
It's okay for Bush to evangelical about legal immigration. that's not what I am getting from his tilted headed down home speech on the subject. He doesn't differentiate and for that he's lost the base IMHO.
Bush says "We are a nation of IMMIGRANTS!!" with that kind of emphasis. We aren't quibbling over immigration here Mr. President. We are pissed about the frigging invasion that's gone tilt the last few years.
Special Report With Brit Hume
FNC May 24 11:00pm Add to My Calendar
Series/Talk, 60 Mins. This is my cable..Central time for those who watch Brit always.(I watch at 5pm normally)
A man has to know his limitations.
quibbling over legal immigration I should have written. Now if he means "we are a nation that brought in black slaves, then chinese laborers then hispanic laborers under the darkness of night (illegally, wink wink) and by gosh that's worked for the country!" at least I could give him points for being clear on the subject. But he just papers over the legality part and leaves you wondering precisely where he stands. Case in point is the Monday speech.
Just wait it out. When there's a Dem in the White House, illegal immigration will be a problem again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.