Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moscow angered by US plan for 'star wars' bases in Europe to counter threat of Iran
Belfast Telegraph ^ | 24 May 2006 | Rupert Cornwell

Posted on 05/24/2006 9:41:45 AM PDT by lizol

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Grzegorz 246
This thing is going to defend US, not Europe.

We really don’t know any details. Why would the Russian cry if this would be the only purpose?

41 posted on 05/24/2006 11:23:10 AM PDT by Lukasz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lukasz

Personally I think we should sell poland some ICBM's and let see the russkies sweat a little as they try and bully you. :)


42 posted on 05/24/2006 11:25:40 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lukasz

"We really don’t know any details."

Most of experts say so.

"Why would the Russian cry if this would be the only purpose?"

Probably because of the same reasons they cried over our membership in NATO.


43 posted on 05/24/2006 11:28:10 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Since it makes little sense for Russia to be "angered" by a missile defense system, I'm inclined to doubt that its true.

Eastern Europe is a good location for such a system, but better yet would be for it to be built in layers, with part of it based in Turkey or Georgia, or even southern Russia if they decided to get on board.

Israel is an obvious target for a missile strike, so its almost a certainty that part of the system will be based there.


44 posted on 05/24/2006 11:29:37 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Read The Ezekiel Option


45 posted on 05/24/2006 11:36:00 AM PDT by Hoboto (I blame Hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lizol

There are several assertions in the article that do not bear the slightest resemblance to reality.


46 posted on 05/24/2006 11:38:41 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Grzegorz 246

Even so, that is MORE of an reason to base in Turkey.


48 posted on 05/24/2006 12:25:34 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: All
Russia Has “Asymmetric Response” to U.S. Missile Defense Plans
49 posted on 05/24/2006 12:48:52 PM PDT by lizol (Liberal - a man with his mind open ... at both ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

I guess I just keep remembering that for most of my life, the Soviets were our main adversary.

Anything that makes a roosski squawk, has got to be good for America.


50 posted on 05/24/2006 12:50:36 PM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Moscow angered by US plan for 'star wars' bases in Europe to counter threat of Iran

Russia does not need to be angry nor worried wince the shield is aimed against Iran, not Russia... at least for now. If Russia politely joins the sanction and agrees with military action, then there will be less need for such shield. We are just politely and legally blackmailing Russia to stop support against terrorist sponsering Iran.
51 posted on 05/24/2006 1:20:08 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

We don't need Turkey at all. We can use Iraq, Kuwait, Georgia, Afghanistan, and Cyprus (Greece) as an alternative to do the job.


52 posted on 05/24/2006 1:22:38 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Turkey seems to be too close, besides they rather wouldn't agree to have this kind of base on their territory.


53 posted on 05/24/2006 1:23:14 PM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: lizol

As long as we can keep them away from the shield generator, it should be alright.


54 posted on 05/24/2006 1:28:53 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

"Iran currently has no weapons capable of hitting western Europe, let alone an intercontinental missile that could strike the United States."

This is a misleading statement. Iran has steadily increased the range of their missiles---especially since 1997 when it became apparent the Russians were providing them with missile technology---if not the missiles themselves. The current Iranian missiles can reach into Central Europe, so the notion that Western Europe should feel safe is ridiculous.


55 posted on 05/24/2006 2:37:21 PM PDT by strategofr (H-mentor:"pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it"Hillary's Secret War,Poe,p.198)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

"The possible extension of missile defences into Poland or the Czech Republic ­ both staunch American allies ­ is the latest episode of a story that has inspired dreams and controversy in equal measure since it was first sketched out by President Ronald Reagan in 1983 as the Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI), quickly dubbed "Star Wars". But despite more than 20 years of work and tens of billions of dollars in spending, it is now accepted that any such shield would be overwhelmed by an attack from Russia, which possesses a nuclear arsenal comparable to the US.

It has now been scaled back to cope with the far more limited strike that North Korea might be able to deliver to the continental US by the end of the decade. So far, nine interceptor rockets are in place at Fort Greely in Alaska, and two more at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. But the viability even of this version is questionable.

"It [the shield] has been doing very poorly," a former Pentagon official involved in the testing told The New York Times. "They have not had a successful flight intercept test in four years." "

Is the Israeli shield better? Then let's just buy theirs.


56 posted on 05/24/2006 2:39:16 PM PDT by strategofr (H-mentor:"pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it"Hillary's Secret War,Poe,p.198)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

"According to The New York Times, the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, is expected to receive a recommendation on a European site in the summer. If the plan for interceptors in Poland goes ahead, it would create the first permanent American military presence in the country."

Yaaa! That's an accomplishment in itself---regardless of the Iranian threat. Go Poland!


57 posted on 05/24/2006 2:40:28 PM PDT by strategofr (H-mentor:"pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it"Hillary's Secret War,Poe,p.198)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol; Romanov

"The most likely base for the system is Poland, followed by the Czech Republic, officials said."

Too bad we didn't do this with General Patton in 1945 - it would have saved us alot of trouble - and about 60 million deaths


58 posted on 05/24/2006 6:00:09 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

"Too bad we didn't do this with General Patton in 1945 - it would have saved us alot of trouble - and about 60 million deaths"

I'll give you this, no matter how empty your rhetoric is you'll cling to it like a drowning rat does to a tree branch in a flood.


59 posted on 05/24/2006 6:03:37 PM PDT by Romanov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

The is the EXACT move we've needed to make for some time. Now we have given the Russians a choice - continue to play footsies with Iran and get us even closer into your backyard OR join the rest of the world in condemning them and make it impossible for this outlaw regime to further its nuclear ambitions.


60 posted on 05/24/2006 6:11:57 PM PDT by Romanov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson