Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing Delivers Final 717s; Concludes Commercial Production in California
The Boeing Company ^ | May 23, 2006 | The Boeing Company

Posted on 05/24/2006 8:23:32 AM PDT by COEXERJ145

LONG BEACH, Calif., May 23, 2006 -- Boeing [NYSE: BA] today delivered its final two 717 airplanes to Midwest Airlines and AirTran Airways in a ceremony before thousands of employees, retirees and dignitaries in Long Beach, Calif. The deliveries conclude commercial airplane production in Southern California that began in the 1920s with the Douglas Aircraft Co.

The 717 program, which produced 156 airplanes, pioneered breakthrough business and manufacturing processes for Boeing Commercial Airplanes.

"Our production system is an industry benchmark because of the lean manufacturing and employee involvement practices we pioneered on the 717 in Long Beach," said Boeing Commercial Airplanes President and Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally. "The 717 has forever redefined how we build airplanes. We're extremely proud of the airplane, our employees and our many supplier partners on the program."

The program was launched by an order from AirTran Airways in 1995, and the airplane quickly became renowned by customers for its excellent economics, performance and reliability. Based on the Douglas DC-9 and launched as the McDonnell Douglas MD-95, the 100-seater was renamed the Boeing 717 after McDonnell Douglas and Boeing merged in 1997.

Douglas opened the Long Beach factory in 1941 as part of President Roosevelt's Arsenal of Democracy - a request to the nation's industries to halt civilian production and assist in making wartime equipment. The facility produced almost 10,000 airplanes for World War II before transitioning to commercial airplane production after the war. Douglas merged with the McDonnell Aircraft Company in 1967, forming the McDonnell Douglas Corporation.

"Truly, it is our people who have acted with tremendous pride and have achieved all of these great accomplishments," said Pat McKenna, vice president and general manager of the 717 program. "They have done this not only on the 717 program but throughout the Douglas history."

More than 15,000 airplanes have been produced in the Long Beach factory.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: 717; airtran; aviationhistory; boeing; goodbyetoallthat; longbeach; mcdonneldouglas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
A sad day in the world of commercial aviation with the end of production in Long Beach.


1 posted on 05/24/2006 8:23:33 AM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I assume Embraeaur(SP) beat them out


2 posted on 05/24/2006 8:27:49 AM PDT by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
"Our production system is an industry benchmark because of the lean manufacturing and employee involvement practices we pioneered on the 717 in Long Beach," said Boeing Commercial Airplanes President and Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally. "The 717 has forever redefined how we build airplanes. We're extremely proud of the airplane, our employees and our many supplier partners on the program."

'Thanks for your creative input and hard work. Now that we know what you've taught us, we'll teach those techniques to somebody who will do it for less. Screw you, we hated paying you as much as we did.'

Corporations own the intellectual property of proprietary processes, in return for which the creators of those processes get a paycheck and a pink slip, as if they are incapable of more. Such is "visionary" corporate leadership.

3 posted on 05/24/2006 8:33:20 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Youngman442002

Embraer


4 posted on 05/24/2006 8:35:14 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (This Space For Rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Ping to You


5 posted on 05/24/2006 8:35:56 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (This Space For Rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I like these planes. They're a bit smaller than the 737, and more economical. Still much more comfortable and efficient than the "regional jets" offered by Canadair and Embraer. Why did they discontinue them?


6 posted on 05/24/2006 8:36:24 AM PDT by RockinRight (She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Corporations own the intellectual property of proprietary processes, in return for which the creators of those processes get a paycheck and a pink slip, as if they are incapable of more. Such is "visionary" corporate leadership.

So, an employee gets the benefit of major corporate funding for his/her research, and should be able to move wherever they please and take the rights to that intellectual property with them? I don't think so.
7 posted on 05/24/2006 8:37:08 AM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
So, an employee gets the benefit of major corporate funding for his/her research, and should be able to move wherever they please and take the rights to that intellectual property with them? I don't think so.

A piece of it, yes, but then I'm not a corporate collectivist.

8 posted on 05/24/2006 8:40:38 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
"Our production system is an industry benchmark because of the lean manufacturing and employee involvement practices we pioneered on the 717 in Long Beach,"

Shouldn't that be finished up with "so we shut down that plant before it got 'catchy'!"

9 posted on 05/24/2006 8:40:52 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
The CRJ's and ERJ's are much more efficient to operate than the 717 or Airbus' A318.
10 posted on 05/24/2006 8:42:18 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (This Space For Rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

No orders.


11 posted on 05/24/2006 8:45:12 AM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
Since the employee was the one who actually had the thoughts( and thoughts belong to the person who thinks them)and the ideas and the company provided the capital to put them into effect, they should be partners with the originator of the intellectual property gettting a percentage of the profits.

Instead they are kicked out the door when it suits the company and given nothing except a weekly paycheck which ends of course when the company decides to do away with them, with the company keeping the intellectual property and continuing to profit by it.

I would judge from your remarks that you think this is fair and right. I don't happen to agree. Without the intellectual property their capital would not gain them much, certainly not to the same degree they get from the profits made from the intellectual property of others.

12 posted on 05/24/2006 8:45:39 AM PDT by calex59 (No country can survive multiculturalism. Dual cultures don't mix, history has taught us that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Because it impacted on sales of the 737?


13 posted on 05/24/2006 8:47:15 AM PDT by ASOC (Choose between the lesser of two evils and in the end, you still have, well, evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
More than 15,000 airplanes have been produced in the Long Beach factory.

It's amazing that 10,000 of these were made during the four years of WWII. What a great company Douglas was. The DC-3 gets my vote as the all-around most successful aircraft of all time. Plenty of them are still flying out of dirt strips in Turd World hell holes, 60 or 70 years after they were built.

At least their successors in Boeing are kicking the snot out of the Eurotrash nowadays.


14 posted on 05/24/2006 8:47:38 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59; July 4th
July 4th talks about corporate capital as if it were the only investment involved. Employees put a lifetime of education and work into developing their skills. That is their capital.

From what I can tell, the ROI on developing technical skills sucks, bigtime. As long as that's the case, this nation will be screaming for H1-B visas because nobody with that kind of ability would be dumb enough to make the investment. They'll become lawyers instead.

How's that for productivity?

15 posted on 05/24/2006 8:52:35 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Without the intellectual property their capital would not gain them much, certainly not to the same degree they get from the profits made from the intellectual property of others.

In most cases of large industry, developing "intellectual property" is a very capital intensive process.

Look at it this way. An architect designs your dream house to your specificiation. A civil engineer works out the construction details. Dozens of skilled craftsmen execute the plans and build the house. You pay them all for their services and labor. Do they own your house, or do you own it?

16 posted on 05/24/2006 8:55:37 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
You pay them all for their services and labor. Do they own your house, or do you own it?

This is not an accurate analogy, because the intellectual property under discussion is an improvement in a manufacturing process. Thus the question isn't about who owns the house as to who owns the knowledge required to make it competitively.

17 posted on 05/24/2006 9:04:38 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
The CRJ's and ERJ's are much more efficient to operate than the 717 or Airbus' A318.

Why doesn't Boeing make a Regional Jet?

18 posted on 05/24/2006 10:49:39 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Concludes Commercial Production in California

What ever happened to the MD-80 line in the Peoples Republic of China?

19 posted on 05/24/2006 11:01:59 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan; COEXERJ145
Why doesn't Boeing make a Regional Jet?

Labor costs in the US are too high to be competitive in that market. They are involved in the Russian Regional Jet (RRJ)project with Russian aerospace companies. What would be really smart would be to have a common cockpit between the RRJ's and the 787.

20 posted on 05/24/2006 11:04:42 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson