Skip to comments.
Hastert tells President Bush FBI raid was unconstitutional
The Hill ^
| 5/24/06
| Patrick O'Connor
Posted on 05/23/2006 5:57:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 381-385 next last
To: baltoga
It's absolutely UNBELIEVABLE. This Republican leadership has to be the most pathetic, spineless, nincompoops I've ever seen. It makes me literally want to scream. Everyday I want to scream.
121
posted on
05/23/2006 6:41:20 PM PDT
by
Hildy
To: NormsRevenge
122
posted on
05/23/2006 6:41:40 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: NormsRevenge
Speaker Hassert did not endear himself with either his fellow Republicans or his adversaries. I guess "stupid is as stupid does" applies to our Congress as well as the developmentally disabled.
Comment #124 Removed by Moderator
To: NormsRevenge
Both Hastert and Frist appear incredibly stupid and corrupt with their stances.
To: MamaLucci
I agree 100%, see the rest of my post and my other posts on this thread about party politics in the House.
But, that just isn't the way it works is it?
Heck, even the GOP barely chimed in on that... probably because they 'reserve the right' to do the same.
To: Jim Noble
It is clearly the intent of the Constitution that Members be sheltered from the actions of the Executive, and for good reason.That sheltering is not absolute but only from arrest. Cong. Jefferson was not arrested--rather, his office was searched pursuant to a lawful warrant issued by the Judiciary Branch.
127
posted on
05/23/2006 6:45:04 PM PDT
by
Hebrews 11:6
(Do you REALLY believe that (1) God is, and (2) God is good?)
To: defconw
Sad to say, but the GOP has distanced itself so far from their electorate that they haven't a clue that their base feels abandoned and forgotten. No wonder this "outrage" of theirs over a corrupt representative's office getting raided (after loads of evidence points to massive illegality) is ringing hollow!!!
Duh! Last time I checked, the mere appearance of defending personal congressional illegal behavior didn't poll well with the public, but then again offending their constituents seems to be the GOP's overt goal these days.
128
posted on
05/23/2006 6:45:38 PM PDT
by
demkicker
(democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
To: mojo114
129
posted on
05/23/2006 6:45:54 PM PDT
by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: NormsRevenge
What the hell are the Pubbies hiding in their offices???????
130
posted on
05/23/2006 6:45:56 PM PDT
by
tubebender
(Tagline...I don't need no stinking tagline...)
To: Mo1
Isn't this sickening? That OUR side of the aisle is defending this guy against the FBI?
The elite class is what brought down China a gazillion years ago and it will bring down this country too.
131
posted on
05/23/2006 6:46:05 PM PDT
by
Peach
(DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
To: NormsRevenge
132
posted on
05/23/2006 6:46:05 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: monkeyshine
They ALL make me sick. Pitchforks, anyone? ;)
133
posted on
05/23/2006 6:47:09 PM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: Sonny M
"Does congress have a procedure it would recommend or legislation it would suggest (or any laws on the books) about how to proceed if a legislative official is using or hiding evidence of corruption in their office?"They hold committee meetings to share information on how all of them can practice such bitchin' and righteous procedures.
134
posted on
05/23/2006 6:47:14 PM PDT
by
Thumper1960
(Politicians are like diapers. They need changed often, and for the same reasons.)
To: Peach
That OUR side of the aisle is defending this guy against the FBI? I hope the Founding Fathers are spinning.
135
posted on
05/23/2006 6:47:37 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: defconw
Can't find the zip code for his district.
136
posted on
05/23/2006 6:47:46 PM PDT
by
mojo114
To: Ikemeister
Congress exempts itself from many of the laws
Not since Newt's "Contract w/ America." Its a "no no" now.
137
posted on
05/23/2006 6:49:02 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: mewzilla
I am literally sick about this. Republicans are doing everything in their power to disgust people. On both sides of the aisle and in between.
138
posted on
05/23/2006 6:49:35 PM PDT
by
Peach
(DICC's - doing the work for the DNC)
To: HangnJudge
Hastert isn't concerned about Jefferson's arrest for bribery.
He is concerned about the protection of papers of Members of the House from the Executive.
The Privileges of the House, established centuries ago in England in fights- real fights- with the King, are at stake.
Though it seems to me that the efforts "SE Mom" related from Byron York are impressive and possibly sufficient, Hastert has cause for complaint. It is his job to protect the House from the Judiciary and Executive.
139
posted on
05/23/2006 6:49:56 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: tongue-tied
The FBI is a part of the executive branch.
140
posted on
05/23/2006 6:50:01 PM PDT
by
petitfour
("Seek the Lord and live.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 381-385 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson