After Bush's desire for amnesty became clear and his run to the amnesty goal post began, I've become a simple consumer. I'll vote (buy) only for what I like: patriotic conservatives.
If a candidate is not conservative, then he doesn't get a vote.
I can see what "great" results can happen (give the country away) when you make a pact with the Yalie devils (RINO's). I have voted 'party line' for the Republican Party's candidates since I was eligible (many, many moons ago). But no longer -- strictly on this immigration issue. This is such a non-starter for me, I can't fathom Bush and Rove not figuring this one out. How can this be off their radar screen?
I'm for immigration that helps the U.S. I'm for the U.S. choosing who those people are. I'm dead set against granting amnesty to illegal aliens -- because they chose to be line jumpers, to start off breaking the law.
Good luck with the RINO's and have a nice day.
You LOVED both terms of the Clinton administration, didn't you. You also simply adored 40 years of the Dems control of both Houses as well, I guess.
Okay, answer me this...WHY DIDN'T YOU THROW A HISSY FIT AND BAIL ON THED GOP, WHEN REAGAN GAVE BLANKET ANMESTY?
You LOVED both terms of the Clinton administration, didn't you. You also simply adored 40 years of the Dems control of both Houses as well, I guess.
Okay, answer me this...WHY DIDN'T YOU THROW A HISSY FIT AND BAIL ON THE GOP, WHEN REAGAN GAVE BLANKET ANMESTY?
"If a candidate is not conservative, then he doesn't get a vote. "
===
Then how do you justify to yourself helping put Congress into the hands of leftist Dems?