[FairOpinion]

"If a candidate is not conservative, then he doesn't get a vote. "


===

Then how do you justify to yourself helping put Congress into the hands of leftist Dems?

[FairOpinion]

Losing Now to Win Later, or, Geraghtyites v. Tapscottians

http://tks.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2IzZjA1OGUzYzQ0MDhhYWI3M2NhMDU2NThiODg4ZDI=


Maybe the public will strongly oppose the Democratic agenda after two years. But then again, maybe they’ll like it, or find parts of it they do like, or maybe they’ll just get used to them. The “let’s lose this year” strategy hands a bunch of Democrats the handy tool of incumbency to keep those seats. And in the Senate races, the candidates get to keep their seats until 2012.


Mark calls a two-year performance of a Democratic congressional majority “the perfect setup for a strengthened conservative majority to return in Congress in 2008, most likely with a White House occupant wise enough to recognize that the ‘emerging Republican (i.e conservative) majority’ had become a reality.”


Maybe. Or, you know, Republicans could skip the losing part and try the crazy idea of winning this year.