Posted on 05/22/2006 5:12:03 AM PDT by unionblue83
A former top Homeland Security official warns that the terrorists aren't confined to the battle fronts abroad, but are already here in America living among us. And he says the government needs to redouble its efforts to root them out.
"While we certainly should continue to take the fight to the enemy wherever he is, we need to face the awful reality that the enemy may already be in our very own backyard," says former Homeland Security Department Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin. "The frightening truth is that there are already terrorists among us."
Osama bin Laden recently warned that al-Qaeda is making final preparations for another massive attack on America. Assuming the terrorist kingpin isn't bluffing, he could have terrorist cells secreted inside American cities.
While the FBI says it's found no evidence of such terror cells here, it also said much the same thing before the 9/11 attacks. And Ervin points out that the bureau nonetheless knows of at least 1,000 al-Qaeda sympathizers in the U.S. today -- a number that he calls "low." It's possible there are thousands of sympathizers supporting and facilitating hundreds of terrorist operatives inside the U.S., he fears, and the FBI has yet to make the connections.
"It's safe to say that a not insignificant number of suspected terrorists are known to be in the country today," Ervin says in a new tell-all book, Open Target: Where America Is Vulnerable To Attack.
While the FBI says it can find no evidence of al-Qaeda cells operating
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
And, considering all the news revealing our national secrets lately, the sleepers that are here know enough to keep off the telephone and avoid the internet. The FBI thus goes deaf .... and tells us "there is no evidence of sleeper cells." Do you see the same picture I do? Buy ammo.
And they have even infiltrated the US Senate.
We've got sevewral nests of them here in Northern Virginia, just across the Potomoac River from DC.
Paul Sperry's written a fairly comprehensive book about them:
Click image above for Sperry's web site
Excerpt: FrontPageMagazine.com interview, April 12, 2005
FP: Didn't the FBI just leak an internal report saying they couldn't find any evidence of al-Qaida sleeper cells in America?
Sperry: Yeah, and that's also what they said before 9/11. Fact is, they don't really know because they're not letting agents look hard enough in the Muslim community and mosquesthey're putting them through Muslim sensitivity training instead. One FBI veteran says our knowledge of what's really going on in the Muslim community is a 20 on a scale of 100. But here's what we do know: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the 9/11 mastermind, was caught with a notebook full of U.S. zip codes, and he's not talking about them. He'll talk about everything else but that. Investigators think he's protecting sleeper cells for a future 9/11. So we have to get to them before they get to us. Unfortunately the FBI appears to be more concerned about offending Muslim groups than infiltrating them. So while they're doing a damn good job of penetrating our institutions and culture, we've hardly made a dent in theirs.
[snip]
"For instance, there's a mosque going up in my own community in Fairfax County that I found out is tied to a Pakistani terrorist who gunned down CIA employees last decade. It took just a few days to look up the land records, and then research the trustees and find the connection. The first red flag was the deed itself, which was notarized in Lahore, Pakistan. Pakistan is a hotbed of anti-American terrorism. This is an example of a Wahhabi mosque that has no business being in business anywhere in America. Ask any FBI case agent who has investigated hardline Wahhabi mosques and they'll tell you they are nothing but sanctuaries of terror. Wahhabi mosques such as Dar al-Hijrah just outside Washington, which gave aid and comfort to the hijackers, act as hubs in the terror support network. Read my expose on it"The 9/11 Mosque"and the related chapter"The 9/11 Imam" (and go to sperryfiles.com to see related classified documents)and you'll see that the fish rots from the head down. It's no coincidence that terrorists show up at these mosques. The leaders of the mosques attract them. It's no coincidence that money is raised for violent jihad at these mosques. The leadership solicits it. It's not just a few bad apples that stumble into these places of worship. It's an entire farm system that nourishes them. Arm yourself with the facts."
Bump.
Ping!
Terrorists Within |
A former top Homeland Security official warns that the terrorists aren't confined to the battle fronts abroad, but are already here in America living among us. And he says the government needs to redouble its efforts to root them out.
"While we certainly should continue to take the fight to the enemy wherever he is, we need to face the awful reality that the enemy may already be in our very own backyard," says former Homeland Security Department Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin. "The frightening truth is that there are already terrorists among us." Osama bin Laden recently warned that al-Qaeda is making final preparations for another massive attack on America. Assuming the terrorist kingpin isn't bluffing, he could have terrorist cells secreted inside American cities. While the FBI says it's found no evidence of such terror cells here, it also said much the same thing before the 9/11 attacks. And Ervin points out that the bureau nonetheless knows of at least 1,000 al-Qaeda sympathizers in the U.S. today -- a number that he calls "low." It's possible there are thousands of sympathizers supporting and facilitating hundreds of terrorist operatives inside the U.S., he fears, and the FBI has yet to make the connections. "It's safe to say that a not insignificant number of suspected terrorists are known to be in the country today," Ervin says in a new tell-all book, Open Target: Where America Is Vulnerable To Attack. While the FBI says it can find no evidence of al-Qaeda cells operating inside America, Ervin insists the agency has not looked at all the Saudi-based evidence since 9/11. He says the FBI failed to examine "stacks of boxes" of potential evidence containing the applications of thousands of young Saudi men who had applied for and received visas to travel to the U.S. around the same time as the 15 Saudi hijackers. Ervin, who recently resigned from DHS, says he discovered several unexamined boxes of Saudi visa applications in a storage room at the U.S. embassy during a trip two years ago to Riyadh, the Saudi capital. He was told by consular officers there that FBI agents neglected to go through the boxes and pull the files to see if there might have been any connections -- tribes, families, villages, occupations, addresses, phone numbers and so on -- between those applicants and the hijackers. Even in the aftermath of 9/11, "predictably, the FBI fell woefully behind in vetting these applications," Ervin says. The FBI missed clues to the first World Trade Center terror plot in 1993 because they were buried in boxes of unexamined evidence from an earlier terror case. Ervin says a team of FBI agents did visit the embassy in the months after the 9/11 attacks and asked the consular section to pull some of the files. But for some unexplained reason, he says, the agents left the embassy in Riyadh without examining the thousands of other applications stored in the stacks of boxes, even though Saudi Arabia is a known al-Qaeda hotbed. "As I write these words today," Ervin says on page 45 of his book, "these applications have yet to be examined, and the more time goes by, the less potentially useful any intelligence they might contain will be." He adds: "While it is certainly possible that the remaining applications contained nothing important, it is equally possible that examining them might yet lead to tracking down other terrorists presently in the United States, lying in wait to launch follow-up attacks, or simply copycat cells hiding out until an opportune time to launch another attack." Ervin speculates that the FBI chose not to examine the other Saudi visa applications because "doing so was too much trouble." Asked about it, FBI spokesman Bill Carter says it's the first he's heard of any unexamined boxes of Saudi visa applications. He says generally it's the State Department's duty to check out visa applicants, and the FBI plays only a minor supporting role in the process. "The State Department is usually responsible for the processing of visa applications. And generally what happens in that regard is there's a name-check process," Carter says. "In other words, they would send the names over to the FBI, and we run it through our case files to determine if there's anything in the FBI databases that would preclude or prevent that individual from coming into the United States." "But," he adds, "I'm not familiar with the fact that there are boxes that remain unreviewed." Carter says the FBI's legal attache office in Riyadh -- which has come under fire recently -- may have been involved initially in reviewing the visa files. But he maintains it was not ultimately responsible for running down terror leads on Saudi individuals after 9/11. "Most of what that [office activity] had to do with was tracking financial issues with regard to support of terrorist groups," Carter explains. FBI agents in Washington have complained that they received little help after 9/11 from the bureau's office in Riyadh, which was run by two Muslim agents. One, Egyptian-born Gamal Abdel-Hafiz, maintains they were understaffed and hobbled by an antiquated computer system. But he and his boss Wilfred Rattigan, a black convert to Islam, nonetheless found time to travel to Mecca for the hajj pilgrimage, where they surrendered their FBI cell phones to Saudi nationals and were out of contact with officials back in the U.S. who were trying to ring them up about investigations into al-Qaeda and 9/11. Both Rattigan and Abdel-Hafiz, who have since been reassigned within the bureau, wore traditional Muslim headgear and robes while on the job in Saudi Arabia, further annoying fellow agents. When a senior FBI supervisor paid a visit to the Riyadh office nearly a year after 9/11, she found secret documents strewn about the office, some even wedged between cabinets. She also found a huge backlog of boxes each filled with three feet of paper containing secret, time-sensitive leads. Much of the materials, including information on Saudi airline pilots, had not been translated or reviewed. Ervin, now a homeland security expert at the Aspen Institute in Washington, insists that someone in law enforcement -- whether the FBI or an agency within DHS -- still needs to review the unexamined boxes sitting in the embassy in Riyadh. "Why hasn't anyone from the Department of Homeland Security bothered to look through them to see whether there might be links between any of those applicants and any of the hijackers?" he complains. DHS, for its part, says it has introduced a program meant to add another layer of security to State's visa application process. Two years ago, under the Homeland Security Act, it deployed so-called Visa Security Officers (VSOs) to Saudi Arabia, still a hotbed of terrorism, to review applications for people who could be considered national security threats. But the Saudi program has been plagued with problems. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) last year reported that officers assigned there are spread too thin by a heavy workload. And the case volume is expected to grow. The administration recently agreed to a request by the Saudi royal government to ramp up the number of student visas issued to Saudi nationals, a process that was slowed after 9/11. Making matters worse, only one of the first 10 VSOs sent to Saudi Arabia could speak Arabic. "Needless to say," Ervin says, "the officers' effectiveness was severely limited by their inability to speak and read the language of the visa applicants." While it remains unclear how many Saudi terrorist suspects have received visas to travel to the U.S., authorities have identified several Saudi nationals associated with the hijackers or al-Qaeda, or both, who are still at large and may pose a potential threat to America. Here are a few: Ervin warns that al-Qaeda is "bound and determined to hit us again, and even harder than last time."
ping and bookmarking
Of course they are here, it's just a matter of when not if.
---------------------------
Complete article in post 8.
It's going to take another attack to wake up this country. The Libs play politics with terrorism detection/prevention and the Republicans cower from their assaults and resulting poll numbers. Al-queda is losing overseas, they will bring the fight here. They will lose here also, thank God and our fore fathers for the 2nd Amendment. No thanks to the American left, the true enemy within.
Be careful, you might give McCain away. Remeber it's a secret.
I suggest that all of us call the Liberals and RINOs in the US Senate and US Congress and inform them of this. They have no clue that we have enemies other than the Bush Administration.
They have a clue. They are just using it to grab more power for themselves. Far from being a "wake up call", I expect anotehr attack on US soil to bring even MORE government "crackdowns" as the Sheeple clamor for more safety...
And this "Mooselimb sensitivity" ditty is going to get a lot of Americans killed, IMO.....
Thanks! Check comment #4 and the book shown in it. I've skimmed it, but haven't read it yet, but it is an eye-opener from what I've gleaned in skimming. Northern Virignia, where I live, is probably high on the sleepers list, having both a large Muslim and a large Aztlantino community.
I don't think there's any probably about it.
I lived in Skyline on 9/11, which is covered in detail in Sperry's book. Some of it I knew or suspected from first hand observation, and also from coverage in the Wash Times (occasionally the ComPost). The place was getting more and more jammed with fundie Muslims during my time there. I'm talking burkas in the elevators, separate gym hours for men and women, Muslim neighbors who refused to even say hello in the hallways, etc.
I won't go into the whole thing, it was spooky, and became a little nervewracking over time (after 9/11).
Example: a realtor there who has her nose to the ground (that's her business, after all) told me the the FBI was at Skyline many times after 9/11, with warrants, etc. There were many abandoned apartments and allegedly many other voluntary and involuntary deportations.
Here's another one: during the 10/2002 sniper period, Malvo and Mohammad for some reason found the Rt. 7 corridor from Skyline up to Seven Corners (that's a one mile stretch) a convenient place to be. Dar al Hijra mosque ("the Wahabbi mosque") is dead center on that little stretch. They murdered the FBI agent at the Home Depot at one end of that route, less than 1/2 mile from Dar al Hijra (about an 8 minute walk). A one time, little noticed report in either the Post or the Times stated they had been pulled over *three separate times* during the shooting spree in the Baileys Crossroads area by Fairfax County police. So they really liked it there.
I confess I did call the FBI after the Home Depot shooting, just to remind them that there were a lot of strange things going on with Muslims in the Skyline area, perhaps they should be alert there, and their answer was "Yes, we know."
The whole thing gives me the creeps, which I why I don't live there anymore.
Also see:
. . .this number does not include the sympathetic 'Hollywood elites' and the Demrats. . .
I work in the Skyline office complex, and was working there during the whole sniper thing in the fall of 2002. I noticed similar things, though only from the outside. A co-worker lives in the Condo complex and says it is like living in a Third World county.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.