Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rintense
If the issue is the child not having a father, then why is adopting any different than a biological child?

???????

...because the adopted child is already in a bad position...

Was that supposed to be a serious question?

257 posted on 05/21/2006 4:18:56 PM PDT by papertyger (Our Constitution isn't perfect, but it's better than what we have right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

Yes it was. Because you're advocating a single woman being a mother, period- regardless of how she has a child. Whether she adopts or chooses to have one of her own is irrelevant, especially is the moral argument if that the child will not have a father.


269 posted on 05/21/2006 4:47:45 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson