Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger

Yes it was. Because you're advocating a single woman being a mother, period- regardless of how she has a child. Whether she adopts or chooses to have one of her own is irrelevant, especially is the moral argument if that the child will not have a father.


269 posted on 05/21/2006 4:47:45 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: rintense

As Justice Alito told the peanut gallery "I can show you the facts. I can't understand them for you." A woman who chooses to have a child while single makes a decision to have a child without the benefit of a father. A woman who adopts a child while single makes a decision to care for a child who has no chance at the best case scenario.

They don't give healthy newborns to single adoptees, you know. First preference goes to married, stable, couples.


278 posted on 05/21/2006 5:07:29 PM PDT by papertyger (Our Constitution isn't perfect, but it's better than what we have right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson