[gidget7]

"The expressed purposes of the ordinance are to protect nonsmokers from exposure to secondhand smoke and to reduce “the potential for children to associate smoking and tobacco with a healthy lifestyle.”


EXCUSE ME???????

No one ever has promoted smoking as a healthy lifestyle. For that matter, IT ISN"T a lifestyle, it's choosing to use a legal product.

Promoting falsely, a healthy lifestyle, is the game of the homosexual agenda. NOT smokers. Promoting behavior that as destructive in every way to say the least, as a healthy lifestyle in school to children, is the game of the homosexual agenda, NOT smokers.

Smokers have never promoted smoking to kids has healthy, not now not ever.

[SheLion]

Promoting falsely, a healthy lifestyle, is the game of the homosexual agenda. NOT smokers. Promoting behavior that as destructive in every way to say the least, as a healthy lifestyle in school to children, is the game of the homosexual agenda, NOT smokers.

Smokers have never promoted smoking to kids has healthy, not now not ever.

This burns me up more then I can say when a FReeper points blame at us saying that we keep saying that smoking does not cause harm.  This is a blatant lie.  We have never ever said that smoking is harmless.

But it IS legal.  And what the government is doing to us for using a legal product is downright illiterate!  IMHO.