Posted on 05/20/2006 10:25:42 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
If you'd like to be on this Death of the West ping list, please FR mail me.
This is an odd conclusion to reach. I'm not sure people sit around wondering what the government will do for them when starting a family.
Yep, this is one of those things that the government don't have much influence on.
Unless they declare all taxes repealed for families with four or more children.
What would we do without "experts"?
Yet another example of skewing statistics in order to lie. Thanks to the open borders policies of the treasonous Blair (along with the British ruling elite in general), the UK now has something on the order of 8-10 perecent of the population that is non-English (including plenty of denizens of the "religion of love and peace"). The real question is: What is the birth rate for the native English (plus the native Scottish, Welsh, and Northern Irish) population vs. that of for Pakistani, Caribbean, African and Asian immigrant popualtion flooding in.
I would be willing to bet that the real English birth rate is more like 1.2 per woman (far below replacement level). Feminsim and liberalism always lead to death. Lies, lies and more lies. Yet the indoctrinated clueless continue to believe them!!
Exactly what I was thinking!!
My guess is they won't be publishing that breakdown.
Mr. Blair is supposed to be for abortion. The British birthrate could be higher without abortion, murdering unborn people.
Aren't some of those immigrants real Englishmen, too?
Only if you define English as as an ideology.
I believe it's Austin Powers, not Tony Blair, that truly deserves the hand-clapping for this achievement.
What % is from the religion of peace breeding for the takeover?
"the UK now has something on the order of 8-10 perecent of the population that is non-English"
Your post would probably make more sense if you sorted out your confusion between 'England', 'Britain' and 'UK'. None of them are the same thing.
"Only if you define English as as an ideology."
How are you defining it? If it's solely on place of birth, then a lot of the people who you are refering to would qualify as 'English' and a lot of people who consider themselves very much English would not do so.
We have a winner! I have an associate that was in London a few months ago and said you couldn't find a native anywhere (obvious exaggeration but you get the point). Welfare attracts the wrong kind of immigrants to a country!
As a ethnic group or nationality (in the tradtional sense). Why should it be defined in any other way? Does the English nation (traditonally defined) have a right to exist, in your opinion? Or, should they be reduced to a minority in their own homeland for the sake of diversity? Of course, the typical leftist today denies the exisitence of ethnicity, except in the case of the precious "other" - who is alway exalted as the perfection of mankind.
The fact that one is born in a garage does make you a car. That may be uncomfortable to today's PC sensibilities, but truth usually is.
He let in more Muslims. The article didn't mention how many of the babies are white Britains. The rising birthrate may not be good news for England.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.