Posted on 05/20/2006 2:15:41 PM PDT by woodb01
Recently ABC News spilled the beans. If you connect the dots, it is easy to understand why the mainstream media is in an uproar over NSA monitoring International calls to suspected terrorists who might be planning on attacking America. IT IS THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT IS MAKING THOSE INTERNATIONAL CALLS!
A few days ago, ABC News ran a story citing another one of those unidentified Federal Government sources warning them that their calls are being monitored. [FN1]
A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we call in an effort to root out confidential sources.
"It's time for you to get some new cell phones, quick," the source told us in an in-person conversation.
This "senior law enforcement official" is likely one of the Federal Attorneys General that were installed during the Clinton Administration. Amazing how many government "leaks" have come from the various government organizations to attack Bush and Republicans, but none seem to ever implicate Democrats.
The ABC News story also provides some interesting insight into the concerns at ABC. Some of the story focuses on the possibility that there may be an investigation into the CIA "leakers" who have been passing classified information to the media. It is understandable why those particular TRAITORS and their ABC allies wouldn't want to be caught.
As I recently noted, in an expose that reveals why the Media does not consider itself terrorists, USA Today ran a FRAUDULENT story about domestic phone monitoring. [FN2] The story is likely out of frustration that the American public did not get angry about the NSA monitoring International calls to suspected terrorists. As some stories over the last couple years have alluded to, Bill Clinton "installed" a number of loyal Democrats to attack the Bush Administration. Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff John Podesta even admitted this in an interview with CNN. [FN3]
Where again is all of this animosity toward Bush and the Republicans coming from? Are Conservatives falling prey to the WELL-DOCUMENTED, VERIFIABLE PLAN by the Democratic Party [FN4] to DESTROY BUSH, DESTROY CONSERVATIVES, AND DESTROY AMERICA IF IT MEANS THEY CAN REGAIN POWER! This DOCUMENTED plan from the Democrats calls for full cooperation from the media in attacking and undermining both Bush and America.
From my perspective, Conservatives had better WAKE UP to who their real enemy is. It's time to fight the left and their media propaganda machine like your life depended on it! The Democratic Party and the Media are America's modern Terrorists who have infested our own shores. If you don't start doing something about it, America may already be too far gone. [FN5]
=====================================
NoDNC.com © 2006 - all unchanged original work may be freely distributed.
http://www.nodnc.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=557
=====================================
[FN1] Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling. May 15, 2006. http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/federal_source_.html
[FN2] Why the Media doesn't see its TREASON. http://www.nodnc.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=555
[FN3] Rolling Back Clinton. How Clinton AMBUSHED Bush's Administration in the Last Days of His Presidency. CNN, January 22, 2001. http://www.nodnc.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=366
[FN4] Dems plan to undermine America to beat Bush. January 6, 2003. Directly from a Strategy Memo released by the Democratic Party that talks about using their media allies to attack American and Bush so they can regain power. http://www.nodnc.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=373
[FN5] For specific action steps you can take to fight back, see the "What you can do" section toward the bottom of the link above in Footnote 2.
The DNC pimp media has been outed again. The question is will the rest of it cover USA TODAY's, shall we say gaffe?
My guess is they will stall, cover, and hide their relationship with the Democrat Party.
PING
They got their headline. For the majority of the sheeple, that's as far as they read anyway. Mission accomplished for USA today.
Compassionate Conservatism has stepped on most every one of them.
ABC Complains About Government Tracing Its Reporters' Calls
ABC News claimed that phone calls made by its reporters and journalists at the New York Times and Washington Post that resulted in leaks of classified information were "honest mistakes."
These reporters were trying to call a "900" number known as "Hot Hips," but inadvertently ended up speaking to CIA agents determined to undermine the president's anti-terrorist telephone data-mining efforts. "Our guys were goofing around, when their calls went astray," said ABC spokesperson, Mona Little. "The CIA agents intimidated us into airing the stories disclosing classified information."
ABC said two of its reporters, Richard Esposito and Brian Ross, were told by an unnamed CIA official that the tires on their cars would be slashed if they refused to disclose the classified information. "Given the choice of undermining U.S. national security or having your tires slashed what would you do?" asked Little. "We felt we had to knuckle under. I am told that those tires are practically brand new."
read more...
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm
George W. Bush has been President for 1,966 days.
All of these "Clinton holdovers" serve at his pleasure and are subject to his direction.
The whole Bill Clinton excuse is old.
I have been saying for five years now that this was Bush's single worst mistake.
The news media would have screamed, of course, and all the liberal bureaucrats and backstabbers who were ousted. But it should have been done right at the start.
I also mentioned Machiavelli's very helpful advice on this subject. If a ruler has to do something that will make him unpopular (like killing his enemies), then he should do it early, do it thoroughly, and do it all at once. Get all the bad news out at once, and then the rest of your term will be one long relief. People will be delighted that you are no longer killing them--or firing them.
King James I, a political idiot but still evidently smarter than Bush on this matter, wrote some advice to his son. Among other things, he told him that the best way to start off his reign was to hang a few people. That would sober his enemies, make people more obedient, and, over the course of his whole reign, would actually result in his having to hang a lot fewer people, because it would teach them to be careful.
But R's are so hard to find. Genuine R's, at any rate. There's a whole lot of fraud.
Kind of like PATCO?
You have OBVIOUSLY not done your homework. One of the cited sources notes very clearly that Clinton did one of the most unusual things of ANY prior Administration.
Toward the end of his Administration, "mysteriously" a whole bunch of Clinton Democrat Operatives suddenly transformed their political careers into being "bureaucrats" within these governmental agencies. IN OTHER WORDS, THEY GOT PERMANENT GS SALARY STATUS AND ARE ON THE PAYROLL AS MOLES!! EVEN JOHN PODESTA ALL BUT SAID SO!!
Yes, I have seen that, too. It appears to have been the case with Mary McCarthy at the CIA.
Very few outsiders knew about this. But surely the players in Washington did. Why the hell didn't Bush tackle this mess in the early days? If they were converted to "bureaucrats" instead of political appointees, it wouldn't have been easy. But if the president and his cabinet had really concentrated on it, the problem could have been solved. At the least, they could all have been shuttled into deadend jobs, instead of leaving them in key posts.
Utter political incompetence, IMHO.
Based on the research I have done, there is a very good reason that Bush, and even his seasoned advisors didn't tackle this issue: NO ONE HAD EVER DONE THIS BEFORE SO THEY HAD NO EXPERIENCE OR PRECEDENT!
Also, the media and the Clintons certainly weren't advertising to the Bush Administration that they had placed MOLES throughout the bureaucracy to ATTACK him during his upcoming administration.
Fact is, hindsight is 20 - 20. I have the benefit of being able to spend a lot of my spare time researching this stuff. Bush and his Administration are so busy fighting TERRORISTS OVERSEAS, IN THE GOVERNMENT, AND IN THE MEDIA that they are certainly exhausted.
The Bush Administration is fighting a multi-Front War against Terrorists abroad AND at home, AND in the government.
Bush's Multi-Front Terrorist War - Why it's going so wrong...
Terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, CIA, and the Justice Department...
That is a MASSIVE war!
Great story title...
Well, it was obvious to me from day one that Tenet was a horrible choice to leave in place at the CIA. If Bush had appointed someone he could trust, a lot of grief would have been avoided.
Most of the agencies and bureaus have a raft of political appointees at the top. If those guys had been on the ball, this couldn't have happened.
But Tenet was left in the CIA. The FBI was turned over to a director who has promoted as many clintonoids as possible and given them medals. The Department of Transportation was given to a Democrat. Of course there has been trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.