The emphasis on 'stakeholders' comes from the corporatization of government.
It started to become apparent back when Clinton signed the executive order that allowed others to sue over the environment even when they weren't the property owner or hurt by other property owners. Everyone who was a 'stakeholder' could sue, everyone who was a 'stakeholder' could have a say. Before only property owners and those directly affected had that authority.
You will also see that many 'directorates' have been set up through the corporatization of government. Up until the "free traders" got hold of our government and set it up to serve them rather than citizens, we didn't have directorate positions in our government. But we do now. We also have interlocking directorates, which in the name of maintaining a free society should be banned, but under the aegis of "free trade" they are part an parcel of the corporatization of our government.
Everywhere you see a usurpation of individual rights, you will see 'stakeholders' demanding rights that do not belong to them.
Well, aren't WE stakeholders in any of this?
Or did I misunderstand what you tried to explain?