Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

"Maybe because he wants people to be free to convert, regardless of legal standing?"

In India they would still be free to convert even with the anti-conversion laws enforced. The laws are meant to stop organized proselytization activity.

"What does this "legal standing" amount to, anyway? Is it that in some countries (Italy? or Russia?), you can't vote, or hold office, or get a passport, or immigrate, or emigrate, or teach in a public school or something, if you don't have the "right" religious credentials?"

It may not personally affect anyone so much especially the economically influencial Indians but morally it still amounts to unequal treatment. That you can deny. Just because you are not an Hindu and you are not sensitive to such issues that does not mean Hindus too will have none.


120 posted on 05/21/2006 9:39:51 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Gengis Khan
The laws are meant to stop organized proselytization activity.

There you go, denial of another fundamental human right -- freedom of speech.

134 posted on 05/21/2006 9:55:07 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Gengis Khan
The laws are meant to stop organized proselytization activity.

Define that. If tomorrow there is a large mass for Christmas and Hindus go for that (and many already DO), is that organised proselytisation?? What if hindus are invited to learn about Christianity? What if Christians are invited to learn about Hinduism?
142 posted on 05/21/2006 10:04:48 AM PDT by Cronos (Remember 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Sola Scriptura leads to solo scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Gengis Khan
I wrote: "What does this "legal standing" amount to, anyway? Is it that in some countries (Italy? or Russia?), you can't vote, or hold office, or get a passport, or immigrate, or emigrate, or teach in a public school or something, if you don't have the "right" religious credentials?"

You wrote: "It may not personally affect anyone so much especially the economically influencial Indians but morally it still amounts to unequal treatment."

I think you misunderstood me. I was asking a sincere question: what does the "legal standing" of a religion mean in the countries we are talking about? If any of these penalties were applied to people anywhere because of their adherance to a disfavored religion, I would say such discrimination is unjust.

179 posted on 05/21/2006 11:32:36 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Inquiring minds want to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson