[William Terrell]

Well, she links to the CFR paper that actually does say what she says it says. Here on FR there are a lot of people who think that the notion that the Council of Foreign Relations makes policy is crazy. But, I've always wondered, what are they doing in highly secret meetings, discussing new ways of making fish sticks?

Do you have a link to that pro-abortion article?

[Rokke]

"Here on FR there are a lot of people who think that the notion that the Council of Foreign Relations makes policy is crazy. But, I've always wondered, what are they doing in highly secret meetings, discussing new ways of making fish sticks?"

It is that kind of thinking that explains how Dan Brown can write a poorly researched book of fiction and have it become an international source book of "facts" about secret societies and the "real truth".

[calcowgirl]

Do you have a link to that pro-abortion article?

Not exacly pro-abortion. Here is what she wrote. You need to read the article to get the context. She was unaccepting of the "Trust Me" explanation of Miers views and set out a series of questions.

(snip)

And why are Miers' advocates constantly talking about her religion, anyway? Is her religion a qualification for office?

Because your wife, your mother and all the women you have appointed to high office - such as Rice and Republican National Committee Co-Chairman Jo Ann Davidson - oppose overturning Roe v. Wade, how can we assume Miers will be any different?

[taxed2death]

"Well, she links to the CFR paper that actually does say what she says it says. Here on FR there are a lot of people who think that the notion that the Council of Foreign Relations makes policy is crazy. But, I've always wondered, what are they doing in highly secret meetings, discussing new ways of making fish sticks?"

you want a surprise? Check out who the current members are.

Most of our senators and a lot of our congress critters. a bunch of our Reps too. Many of the talking heads in the news rooms are too.