Skip to comments.
Bush plunges to 22 percent (NY State)
WND ^
| 19 May 2006
Posted on 05/18/2006 10:55:41 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Could this be possible...????
To: Aussie Dasher
well the 82% number is a post-9/11/01 number, so I would be more interested in his 9/10/01 NY number.
To: Aussie Dasher
If you get the right spin on the question in the poll then you can get higher poll numbers for even Saddam over Bush.
If you set up the game, rules, who you ask and results, you will probably get the outcome you want all the time.
Would it be accurate? No, only for the one manipulated small group you created.
But, these days papers create news with polls to make money, so don't be so surprised by this.
3
posted on
05/18/2006 10:59:52 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Aussie Dasher
I don't think President Bush's nationwide numbers are at 22%.
4
posted on
05/18/2006 11:00:50 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: A CA Guy
We should start a pool, when will Bush hit negative poll numbers? -23% disapprove.....
To: Aussie Dasher
only 39 percent of voters were willing to call for a complete removal of U.S. troops from Iraq. the way the article is written it sounds like the author is biased against the war.
To: Aussie Dasher; A CA Guy; Indy Pendance
New York voters who gave George Bush soaring 82 percent approval ratings in 2001 have turned their backs on the president, with only 22 percent now saying they approve of the way he's doing his job.78% Ignorant
7
posted on
05/18/2006 11:05:36 PM PDT
by
beyond the sea
("If you see strange men lurking about in groups of three - especially in North Carolina, RUN!)
To: A CA Guy
LOL, Democrats would prefer Saddam over George W. Bush, Saddam is no threat to them, or the power they so dearly miss.
Saddam Hussein is a victim of the foreign policies of George W. Bush in their minds. The Democrats never miss an opportunity to say that Saddam had no WMD's, or that Saddam was trying to comply with the U.N. Demands, and that George W. Bush was only going after Saddam Hussein because he tried to kill his father
8
posted on
05/18/2006 11:05:46 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
To: Aussie Dasher
Low poll numbers in New York...what a shock!!!!
9
posted on
05/18/2006 11:07:09 PM PDT
by
bigjoesaddle
("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke)
To: Indy Pendance; A CA Guy; Aussie Dasher
We should start a pool, when will Bush hit negative poll numbers? Maybe when they vote more than once and ask the dead.
10
posted on
05/18/2006 11:07:14 PM PDT
by
beyond the sea
("If you see strange men lurking about in groups of three - especially in North Carolina, RUN!)
To: bigjoesaddle
New Yorkers are still in shock over the outcome of the 1960 World Series.
;-)
11
posted on
05/18/2006 11:08:51 PM PDT
by
beyond the sea
("If you see strange men lurking about in groups of three - especially in North Carolina, RUN!)
To: Indy Pendance
Well Zogby is still a Muslim connected pollster.
There is no love in the rest of the press for him, so I would say his chances of reelection in 2008 are nonexistent.
12
posted on
05/18/2006 11:09:01 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
You may be right but!
There seems to be a lot of people asking where is the Republican leadership to lead the majority who are against the current immigration bill in congress.
John McCain, Arlen Specter and several others have gone over to the dark side.
I can see by McCain's physical appearance and his voice inflections that he truly despises those Conservative senators offering amendments to his prized citizenship giveaway.
Bill Frisk the coward can pack his bags and go back to his plush digs in Tennessee because he would never make a good presidential candidate.
Why in the world did this sorry excuse for a Senate leader ever put a RINO like Specter in charge of the immigration bill?
13
posted on
05/18/2006 11:09:39 PM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: beyond the sea
They would probably go so far as to fabricate the whole thing and not bother to take the data in.
14
posted on
05/18/2006 11:10:20 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Registered Democrats are about 64% of New York state's electorate.
To: OKIEDOC
Why in the world did this sorry excuse for a Senate leader ever put a RINO like Specter in charge of the immigration bill? Seniority and for surviving cancer I would think. He acts like he has mad cow though.
16
posted on
05/18/2006 11:12:49 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Bush received 40% of New York state's vote in 2004. It's possible that the survey oversampled Democrats.
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Aussie Dasher
It's getting so blatant that people are gong to start catching on - This is an orchestrated campaign, remember the 'exit-polls" in 2004 - totally bogus? ...you can get whatever results you want for any poll - except a phone call
in... Remember the phone call ins? For example, just before the first Reagan election - all the polls said he would loose 2 to 1.
Then came the phone in poll, where people themselves could call in and vote - and they did, by the millions. It said: yes, 2 to 1 - FOR Reagan - and that's the way it went.
We need to get the RNC to conduct a phone IN poll- I'll guarantee it will blow these phony pools out of the water
19
posted on
05/18/2006 11:17:37 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
To: Aussie Dasher
I can't wait for the MSM to tell me his approval rating has gone negative.
20
posted on
05/18/2006 11:22:06 PM PDT
by
JeffersonRepublic.com
(There is no truth in the news, and no news in the truth.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson