To: justshutupandtakeit
If I understand your post #188 correctly, then, you are arguing that banning modern firearms is OK because they have grown immensely in capability from what existed in the late 18th century.
Is that what you are saying?
190 posted on
05/24/2006 11:31:23 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: Joe Brower; justshutupandtakeit
Maybe not in 188, but definately in 186.
Maybe they think we should get rid of all those multi-ton killing machines known as automobiles as well. And baseball bats, and golf clubs, and sharp rocks... After all, there is no Constitutional protection for owning a baseball bat now is there?
191 posted on
05/24/2006 11:42:32 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
To: Joe Brower
Was the word banning in that post or any other I have posted? I didn't think so.
What I have said and still say is that Absolutist interpretations of the Second aids those who are opposed to it.
195 posted on
05/24/2006 12:27:15 PM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson