Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Brower; justshutupandtakeit
Maybe not in 188, but definately in 186.

Maybe they think we should get rid of all those multi-ton killing machines known as automobiles as well. And baseball bats, and golf clubs, and sharp rocks... After all, there is no Constitutional protection for owning a baseball bat now is there?

191 posted on 05/24/2006 11:42:32 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse

Automobiles are under far more control than firearms in some respects. You cannot legally drive one without passing tests showing that you can control it and that you understand the rules of the road. Not so with firearms no proficiency tests are required, no vision tests. You do not even have to know which end the bullet comes out of to buy weapons capable of immense damage.

And Nope there is no constitutional guarantee of owning a baseball bat.

BTW you lie about 186 as well as 188.


199 posted on 05/24/2006 12:43:56 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson