Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

There is nothing illogical about recognizing the vast increase in firepower and killing ability of modern weapons. Not a week goes by without a story of an innocent killed inadvertently by bullets passing through walls or a ceiling. But reality has no meaning to fanatics.

I notice you do not address most of the other examples I listed or the origin of the Second.


188 posted on 05/24/2006 11:15:00 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
Modern weapons? Not that cannard again.

The "origin" of the Second is in the inalienable, Natural, Right of man to fight off an aggressor. Be it a natural predator or a political one. "Modern Weapons" are particularly suited to this purpose.

Despite the hoplophobic whining of liberals like you.

A lot of those "innocents" you cry about are already in Gun Control heavy areas of the US. They have no option to fight back and the criminals doing the drive by's know this. They can shoot at each other with impunity.

Are you by any chance related to Josh Sugerman?

189 posted on 05/24/2006 11:20:03 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: justshutupandtakeit
If I understand your post #188 correctly, then, you are arguing that banning modern firearms is OK because they have grown immensely in capability from what existed in the late 18th century.

Is that what you are saying?

190 posted on 05/24/2006 11:31:23 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson