Skip to comments.
Still Dodging Immigrations Truths (Samuelson on excessive low-skill immigration)
Washington Post ^
| 5/17/06
| Robert Samuelson
Posted on 05/18/2006 4:20:39 AM PDT by ProCivitas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
This one was cited and much discussed on both Howie Carr and my beloved Laura Ingraham yesterday. I think it's still linked at both sites. Important facet of the issue: driving down the wages of our fellow Americans through all immigration. If it's not Pro-American, why allow it?
To: ProCivitas
Explain to me how ILLEGAL LOW PAYING immigrants are going to FUND our retirement?
Shouldn't we be encouraging SKILLED LEGAL immigrants?
Bush has it backwards.
Our standard of living is being pushed down with ILLEGALS who will do anything and those that ARE DOING JOBS AMERICANS WANT TO DO. More importantly we are proving that our laws are arbitrary and we REWARD people who break them.
2
posted on
05/18/2006 4:23:47 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
To: nmh
Even with skilled legal immigrants there are many of the same issues, large corporate interests vying with the interests of US workers. If unskilled immigrants, in excess, depress wages of unskilled Americans, so do skilled immigrants, in excess, depress wages of skilled Americans. Right now we have Tysons wanting illegals to run its chicken plants, but ultimately this is little different from Microsoft importing aliens to run its software factories.
3
posted on
05/18/2006 4:33:22 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
To: nmh
Bush is a dimwit, in case you haven't figured it out yet.
If he allows Iran to get the bomb, he will be the worst President we've ever had.
4
posted on
05/18/2006 4:38:29 AM PDT
by
tomahawk
(Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
To: ProCivitas
I think it's time to settle this aspect of the debate. It is clear that a large influx of Mexicans will be a COST, not a BENEFIT to our economy.
5
posted on
05/18/2006 4:45:11 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: nmh
Explain to me how ILLEGAL LOW PAYING immigrants are going to FUND our retirement? They're not.
What they are going to do, however, is help Americans pay the increasing costs of funding "our retirement" while at the same time enabling us to maintain our very high standard of living.
It's really all that simple, folks.
6
posted on
05/18/2006 4:54:24 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: DManA
They already are costing Americans BILLIONS of dollars, they definitely are not worth it.
And how mnay low paying jobs are there really? Glad you asked!
There aren't that many McDonald minimum wage jobs available what has happened is that the traitors are construction companies, Instead of paying American workers $18.00 per hour and have to abide by the legal costs of hiring people like paying taxes on the people etc the construction companies decided to take the law into their own hands and decided they would rather pay the illegals $18 per hour cash and NOT have to abide by all the rules placed on them by the liberals who set the employment laws to begin with!!
Should companies be allowed to take the laws into their own hands regarding employment laws?
Should construction companies decide whether they want to pay taxes or not?
Because they are paying the exact same amount of money to the illegals under the table they were paying legal residents folks, I know I spoke with an owner of one of the companies.
7
posted on
05/18/2006 4:55:07 AM PDT
by
stopem
(Sorry illegals the jobs are drying up you will be loitering a long time!)
To: ProCivitas; nmh; thoughtomator; tomahawk; jpsb; Earthdweller; Paloma_55; Wolfie; ...
As between general workers, manager/executives, and 'passive investors': I would prefer to see the first paid substantially more than currently, and the latter two paid somewhat less than currently.
Is that what a 'fair/unimpaired market' would do? What do 'distorted markets' do re such things? How do markets become impaired/distorted?
8
posted on
05/18/2006 4:59:12 AM PDT
by
ProCivitas
(Qui bono? Quo warranto? ; Who benefits? By what right/authority ?)
To: ProCivitas
9
posted on
05/18/2006 5:01:13 AM PDT
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: Beth528; amihow
As between general workers, manager/executives, and 'passive investors': I would prefer to see the first paid substantially more than currently, and the latter two paid somewhat less than currently.
Is that what a 'fair/unimpaired market' would do? What do 'distorted markets' do re such things? How do markets become impaired/distorted?
10
posted on
05/18/2006 5:08:48 AM PDT
by
ProCivitas
(Qui bono? Quo warranto? ; Who benefits? By what right/authority ?)
To: Alberta's Child
Your right. Assimilation of immigrants has worked so well in Europe, let's copy it here.
To: ProCivitas
"Their presence in the labor market increases competition for low-skilled jobs, reducing the earnings of low-skilled native-born workers.
Look at the high school graduation rates in this country *now* and tell me where these failed low-skill students are going to work when faced with continued unfettered illegal immigration?
12
posted on
05/18/2006 5:52:27 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Support Apartheid in Mexico! Hire an illegal today!)
To: Alberta's Child
while at the same time enabling us to maintain our very high standard of living.
We cannot maintain our standard of living by allowing in uncontrolled numbers of people that cost more than what they pay in. It is really that simple.
13
posted on
05/18/2006 5:54:40 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Support Apartheid in Mexico! Hire an illegal today!)
To: Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; Pyro7480; ...
The tax increases that will be required to pay for existing federal commitments to the elderly are on the order of 30 to 40 percent. People who don't think there will be conflicts between older beneficiaries and younger taxpayers -- Hispanic or not -- are deluding themselves.
14
posted on
05/18/2006 6:04:33 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(General Buck Turgidson: "Mr. President... I'm beginning to smell a big, fat Commie rat.")
To: HiJinx
To: stopem
they are paying the exact same amount of money to the illegals under the table they were paying legal residentsI've also been told this by ... ahem... people who would know. In fact I've been told that illegal "day laborers" demand the same amount of *cash* wages that would be paid to a legal American day laborer, but with taxes and FICA deductions.
From those anecdotal conversations, it's pretty clear that the "underpaid and abused" illegal alien "day laborer" is a myth, nothing more.
16
posted on
05/18/2006 6:27:05 AM PDT
by
angkor
To: ProCivitas
If great amounts of cheap labor were what it takes for prosperity then Mexico would be running rings around us.
17
posted on
05/18/2006 8:04:43 AM PDT
by
junta
(It's Jihad stupid! It's the borders stupid! It's Political Correctness stupid!)
To: ProCivitas
Great article. But I think there was another thread on it, syndicated by a different paper.
To: thoughtomator
.....so do skilled immigrants, in excess, depress wages of skilled Americans. Yes they do. Fortunately, the government does keep tabs on them and doesn't let them sneak into the country.
19
posted on
05/18/2006 8:34:20 AM PDT
by
Mogollon
To: angkor
The employer makes out by not paying FICA and Workers Comp.
20
posted on
05/18/2006 8:41:03 AM PDT
by
chris1
(I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson