Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Canada has enough oil sands to supply the world with oil for the next five hundred years, but at $30 a barrel it is not economically feasible to extract it with the steam technology required.

At $70 per barrel, however, it is quite economically feasible and production is being ramped up even as we whine about forcing people to use alternatives.

I have heard that many times before and it was true, when oil was $30 a barrel. But now that oil is $70/barrel the oil sand oil probably costs $100/barrel. Still infeasible.

75 posted on 05/17/2006 1:36:05 PM PDT by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
But now that oil is $70/barrel the oil sand oil probably costs $100/barrel. Still infeasible.

Then why is one-third of Canada's current oil production from oil sands?

If it's infeasible, how is it being done?

77 posted on 05/17/2006 1:37:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: palmer
Alberta alone is producing as much oil from sands as Texas is from traditional deposits:

Production in Alberta is up 61 percent over the past four years. This year, Alberta's oil sands are expected to produce 1.2 million barrels a day, roughly equal to the production of Texas.

79 posted on 05/17/2006 1:41:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson