Posted on 05/17/2006 7:01:52 AM PDT by Gipper08
President Bush and Senate Republicans have given conservatives little to cheer about lately, but over in the House of Representatives, a band of conservative Republicans have held firm in conservative principles.
Thanks to the hard work and determination of Rep. Mike Pence (Ind.), chairman of the Republican Study Committee, conservatives still have hope for the future of the GOP.
Pence, the 2005 HUMAN EVENTS Man of the Year and the first member of Congress to start a blog, spoke to a group of 16 conservative bloggers during our weekly bloggers’ briefing today in Washington. Despite the troubles facing his party, Pence offered a positive, can-do message.
If Republicans are to have a chance this November, Pence said the GOP needed to get back to the basics on three issues:
Limited government Fiscal discipline Rule of law “If we fail to do these things,” Pence told us, “I think this fall could bode very ominous for the life of the conservative movement.”
When asked if a GOP loss of Congress might awaken the party, Pence said such an outcome would be disastrous. He cited the Democrats’ willingness to increase the size of government and abandon the U.S. effort in Iraq as reasons frustrated Republicans ought to think twice before pulling the lever for a Democrat this fall.
Pence said he foresaw conservatives’ displeasure early in President Bush’s first term when a group of 25 House Republicans stood firm in opposition to the No Child Left Behind Act. He said it happened again with the Medicare prescription drug bill—the largest entitlement since LBJ.
Other topics on Pence’s mind:
He opposes the 527 “reforms” supported by House leadership. Pence told us Republicans are headed down a path that will eventually restrict nearly all freedom afforded to Americans when it comes to elections.
He said Republicans need to stand up for a free-market economy. The GOP’s willingness to go along with price-gauging legislation was a mistake, Pence said.
It’s inexcusable that Republicans aren’t able to get a bill passed to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil exploration.
When asked about immigration, he said, “It’s a safe bet the Senate will produce a bad bill on any topic.” He said House Republicans are resigned to the fact that the Senate will pass a bill that includes some form of amnesty. Coming soon: Pence plans a major speech at the Heritage Foundation next week to make the case for a guest-worker plan. Yes, you read that correctly. Pence will throw his weight behind the Krieble Foundation’s guest-worker plan, which would require illegal immigrants to leave the United States and then apply for re-entry. More on that later.
UPDATE -- 10:45 p.m.: A couple other bloggers at today’s meeting have reports on Pence’s talk.
Larry Scholer of the Heritage Foundation’s Policy Blog:
Pence focused his remarks on campaign finance reform, immigration reform, and energy. He has long been an opponent of campaign finance reform, from McCain-Feingold to the 527 reform recently passed by the House. For Pence, more freedom is the answer to 527 reform. Moreover, he worries that restricting political speech leads down the slippery slope to even more government intrusion in the daily lives of Americans. "We are on the road to serfdom in the American political debate," he said.
Tim Chapman of Townhall’s Capitol Report:
Pence drove home the need for "environmentally responsible oil exploration" and his idea is one worth considering. As gas prices continue to rise, those who oppose ANWR drilling will be forced to reconcile their cries for lower gas prices with their insistance that America not explore oil resources within our own borders.
Mr. Bluey is editor of Human Events Online.
MIke Pence ping
The way things are going....and the schizo minds of many Republicans, especially in the Senate...
I have a feeling that by this time next year, Pence's name may be the only candidate for POTUS that is CLOSE to what conservatives want.
Hopefully, c-span will record and show Pence's speech at the Heritage Foundation.
Thanks for the ping, Gip.
Pence Ping
Pence Ping
Hmmm......Pence/Tancredo 2008 or Pence/Coburn? Could this be the season for a VIABLE 3rd party? I'm so sick of sending ahem, CONSERVATIVES to the Congress and have them acting like anything BUT when they get up there!:(
Pence is as good as it gets. But I wonder if he has the charisma to win.
Newt can win. He's perfect on immigration and that will vastly overcome whatever baggage he may have. Newt/Pence would be great.
I'd like to hear arguments from anyone who thinks Newt is too damaged to run.
I like Newt, in fact, I like him a lot.
But a lot of Christian conservatives point out that he is a serial adulterer. Alas, that is true and that is no small negative in my mind, nor in the minds of social conservatives.
Pence has none of the baggage that Newt has. He is the only legitimate conservative in the Reagan tradition (ie, no snarl). My fear is that he won't run this time.
Some day he WILL run...this is obvious just as it was obvious that starting in 1966 Reagan was going to run. What we need to do is make sure that when he runs, he has an army that is like Reagan's in 1976 ALMOST unstoppable, and then in 1980, was in fact, ACTUALLY unstoppable.
The paralells between now and the early '70's are too great to ignore. We are now the party of Gerald Ford. But that is going to change. Hopefully sooner rather than later.
Thanks for the ping Gipper! Mike sounds better and better.
http://grades.betterimmigration.com/testgrades.php3?District=IN06&VIPID=952
The country needs this man as President!
"Goldwater in '64!"
"In your heart, you know he's right."
/'60s flashback
Do you know any specifics about his adultery?
Only that he is on his third marriage (I think) and this one is to a former staffer (I think) who was on his staff while he was married to his second wife. In addition, I don't think that his first divorce was all that amicable, either, because of the presence of another woman.
That's my understanding, but if that is not correct, I welcome someone to set the record straight.
Newt is too damaged to run. Newt doesn't have a base. Newt is the architect of the Impeachment in many peoples minds and will never get over it. Newt left his dying wife, blah, blah, blah. Lately hasn't Newt been buddying up with Hillary? Newt is too intellectual to be a good leader. He gets caught up in academic trends. Newt had to pay one trillion dollars in campaign fines while being put in a pillory by the House Ethics Committee. Newt resigned in disgrace, over something. The Contract on America failed. It was ruled unconstitional by judges.
This is what will be said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.