MILLER to BIN LADEN: "We can't keep meeting like this...someone is going to suspect something..."
Well, if they are calling terrorists to interview, too effin' bad!
THEIR calls need tracing. I, for one, can never tell whose side they are on...the huggy, lovey terrorists or the horrible, racist Americans. ;)
If there's a lunch truck outside the ABC offices, he'd do well to add Tums, anti-perspirant, Paxil, and dry underpants to his offerings.
Well if their actions are traitorous what the hell do you expect?
C.BS, A.b.c. and n.b.c. are so very worthless as sources for accurate news.
It's a good start...
Did they make or recieve phone calls with known terrorists??
So, what's the big deal? If the info is CLASSFIED what the hell is ABC doing "leaking" it? The term "leak" sounds so innocuous and unharmful Yet, when I was on Active Duty in the Navy if I had spread CLASSIFIED information the way the media does today via "leaks" I would have been sent to the brig via a Court-Martial. It's about time the Administration take a hard line and prosecute those that divulge classified info.
ABC should name the "unnamed senior federal official." Otherwise this story is just a lot of smoke and mirrors from a couple of major whiners.
wow...maybe we could have heard blather making up his stories on the phone.....
now we can read how perfect abc is .... NOT!!!!
Excellent. We're finally dealing with the enemy within!!
These cats just love it when information is "leaked". I find it abso-smurfly hilarious how these folks react when sources are "leaked".
This just shows that these folks do not really care about the truth or the reporting of the truth.
If a person is unwilling to stand by what they say then, personally, I put little to no stock in the validity of what is being said.
The Koran flushing story is a great example.
When are these folks going to learn that REAL JOURNALISM is as much about SOURCING the material accurately as it is about the content of what it is they write about?
MSM is dying out and the term "unnamed former high ranking administration official" is IMHO the biggest reason why.
The MSM could go a long way towards gaining people's support if they would actually get back to naming names that go with actions they deem improper. Oh and a little reporting on positive things might help them out as well.
MILLER to BIN LADEN: "We can't keep meeting like this...someone is going to suspect something..."
Yeah, the media can be as unscrupulous, traitorous and underhanded as it likes, but the government has to walk some kind of media-defined straight and narrow in dealing with them? I don't think so. I hope they nail them once and for all for providing aid and comfort to the enemy.
RATHER to SADDAM: "Are you sure you changed your cell number?"
Well, the NYT and other news agencies demand that the government release information - memos, emails, phone messages, etc. - that THEY are interested in, so why can't the government investigate things as well? Why does the news media arrogantly assume that it has rights and priviliges that the government itself doesn't have?
GOOD !!!!!!
Good news...I am happy to see someone on the ball
ARAFAT to LIB MEDIA: "Make sure you get my new cell number..."