Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Full Text, Bush Speech.
Instapundit ^ | May 15, 2006 | GWB

Posted on 05/15/2006 5:14:48 PM PDT by Leisler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-379 next last
To: raybbr

How was the thread?


241 posted on 05/15/2006 8:07:21 PM PDT by JustPiper (We will be Governed by Rule of Law NOT by Mob Rule Senator !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

And the colored girls sing, doop, deedoop, da dooptee do doop...


242 posted on 05/15/2006 8:07:36 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

I think that's why they need to toughen the test for English literacy--if you can't read English it's very difficult to function in the USA.


243 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:23 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Well, we may as well give the keys to the front door of the Capitol to Nancy Pelosi because they're going to be hers in November. I am so disappointed I can't see straight. Bush completely failed to move the ball and gave NOTHING to his base. I won't abandon the party in November, but many will. This is the sorriest day of his presidency.


244 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:26 PM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Actually, Rush today on his show said the estimates are 210+ million in 20 years.


245 posted on 05/15/2006 8:08:54 PM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unixfox; Admin Moderator

Is that a slur buddy?


246 posted on 05/15/2006 8:10:57 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Disgusted in Texas
I voted for this man!!!!!!!!WHY!!!!!!!!!!

Same reason I did. Twice.
And I would vote for him again.

Why?
I guess I am a "glass half-full" kinda guy.
Name anyone else then and now who might have done better under the circumstances (who is semi-sane).

247 posted on 05/15/2006 8:11:07 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc; P-Marlowe; jude24; Corin Stormhands; OldFriend
obeying in part is not true Christianity

Actually, obeying in part IS true Christianity.

It is quite clear that Abraham and Lot (his nephew) were UNWELCOME Aliens in their sojourns. They had left their country in roughly Iraq, and they had traveled to Palestine. Many objected to their use of water and pasture.


248 posted on 05/15/2006 8:11:12 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
It was certainly good the W didn't use the "Fightin' Words" he's used in the recent past - vigilante, work no American will do...
Uhhhhmmm...
This program would match willing foreign workers with willing American employers for jobs Americans are not doing.
Words to that effect. A subtle change in wording.
249 posted on 05/15/2006 8:12:32 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

At the rate they reproduce, 20 years is enough for 2 people to become 7 people. If you have two married couples, in 20 years you would have 16, with the oldest already becoming parents. If you have 10 million people, having 5 children each, that is 35 million without having any relatives come into this country.


250 posted on 05/15/2006 8:12:36 PM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

The weak point in any of these programs is, that the illegals will not believe that this country will have the will to send them home EVER.


251 posted on 05/15/2006 8:13:43 PM PDT by jeremiah (How much did we get for that rope?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Hmmm...I guess that's when we'll be doing the next amnesty package. Another 20 years from now.

This will be the LAST amnesty. Their massive numbers will dictate that an amnesty will never happen again.

252 posted on 05/15/2006 8:14:10 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All
At the same time, we are launching the most technologically advanced border security initiative in American history. We will construct high-tech fences in urban corridors, and build new patrol roads and barriers in rural areas. We will employ motion sensors … infrared cameras … and unmanned aerial vehicles to prevent illegal crossings. America has the best technology in the world – and we will ensure that the Border Patrol has the technology they need to do their job and secure our border.


I am optomistic, but cautious. does this mean there will be a REAL "barrier" allong the entire border? (or just more of the vehicle barriers.

And temporary workers must return to their home country at the conclusion of their stay.


This I like. HOWEVER it is tempered with what is below. If the guest worker is a NON CONVERTABLE visa and is NOT connected to dealing with the 11 million (soon to be 100 million family included) it is a positive. The guest worker program should not be linked in any way to the illegals in this country unless they leave and apply to join it.

That middle ground recognizes that there are differences between an illegal immigrant who crossed the border recently – and someone who has worked here for many years, and has a home, a family, and an otherwise clean record. I believe that illegal immigrants who have roots in our country and want to stay should have to pay a meaningful penalty for breaking the law … to pay their taxes … to learn English … and to work in a job for a number of years. People who meet these conditions should be able to apply for citizenship – but approval would not be automatic, and they will have to wait in line behind those who played by the rules and followed the law. What I have just described is not amnesty – it is a way for those who have broken the law to pay their debt to society, and demonstrate the character that makes a good citizen.


This I don't like. If this is the REAL goal then THERE IS NO REASON TO CHANGE CURRENT LAW WHICH DOES PROVIDE FOR THIS EXACTLY AS DESCRIBED. This is the law RIGHT NOW. No new law, no need to change. Illegals in the USA for ten years who have done exactly as described have the path for a hardship visa and a then after five years can apply for citizenship.


I would be more optomistic if this were clearly not linked to the guest worker visa. This is just being deliverd as an easing of the current law. I think the public would be more accepting if the current process was simply brought forward to the public.

The bottom line is this was a good day for the illegals.
253 posted on 05/15/2006 8:21:20 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu

I am voting to keep the Commie bastards out. Demorats are smelling blood and they want the Conservatives to be split. They know that if we are split that they will win. I remember the Socialism they started pushing as soon as they took power in the 90s. I never want to see that again.


254 posted on 05/15/2006 8:24:13 PM PDT by do the dhue (I hope y'all will help bail me out of jail after I dot Coward Dean's eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Tancredo must be a RINO now. He likes the plan and the speech.

That's funny. On O'Reilly he said he'd rather have no bill at all than what the President proposed. I just heard it again on the re-run and I see other FReepers quoting him on other threads. Where did you see Tancredo say he liked it?

255 posted on 05/15/2006 8:25:19 PM PDT by TigersEye (Sedition and treason are getting to be a Beltway fashion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

I mailed all of you the full text of the speech a couple of hours ago.


256 posted on 05/15/2006 8:25:54 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Here, in my opinion, is one critical paragraph:

"I believe that illegal immigrants who have roots in our country and want to stay should have to pay a meaningful penalty for breaking the law … to pay their taxes … to learn English … and to work in a job for a number of years. People who meet these conditions should be able to apply for citizenship – but approval would not be automatic, and they will have to wait in line behind those who played by the rules and followed the law. What I have just described is not amnesty – it is a way for those who have broken the law to pay their debt to society, and demonstrate the character that makes a good citizen."

Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any retroactivity to any of it - - no penalty.
That makes it amnesty.

257 posted on 05/15/2006 8:31:02 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

Thanks for sending me the speech. I'll reread it to see where it says the current illegal immigrants can have a path to eventual citizenship, AFTER the poor souls who have been waiting for many years to enter legally. Maybe it's there. I'll look. Now, off to check my "pings" ;-)


258 posted on 05/15/2006 8:31:16 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

I am not thrilled with this contents of this speech but I am (surpisingly) not totally disappointed.

I see enough wiggle room there to allow for the base to have the ability to have the amendments we want and still keep the left disapointed. (ie kick out the increase in the family importees, kick out the restoration of anchor babies, kick out the dream act, put in a full "barrier")

I will be voting republican in the fall. That has not changed during the entire immigration debate.


259 posted on 05/15/2006 8:34:31 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Apprently you did not read that illegals are subject to the laws. An illegal alien is not a Ger. And yes, I am familiar with grace.


260 posted on 05/15/2006 8:35:08 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-379 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson