Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Full Text, Bush Speech.
Instapundit ^ | May 15, 2006 | GWB

Posted on 05/15/2006 5:14:48 PM PDT by Leisler

FROM THE WHITE HOUSE, here's the full text of Bush's speech. Click "read more" to see it.

Read More »

Embargoed Until Delivery

At 8:01:30 P.M. EDT

Monday, May 15, 2006

THE PRESIDENT DELIVERS AN ADDRESS TO THE NATION

As Prepared for Delivery

Good evening. I have asked for a few minutes of your time to discuss a matter of national importance – the reform of America’s immigration system.

The issue of immigration stirs intense emotions – and in recent weeks, Americans have seen those emotions on display. On the streets of major cities, crowds have rallied in support of those in our country illegally. At our southern border, others have organized to stop illegal immigrants from coming in. Across the country, Americans are trying to reconcile these contrasting images. And in Washington, the debate over immigration reform has reached a time of decision. Tonight, I will make it clear where I stand, and where I want to lead our country on this vital issue.

We must begin by recognizing the problems with our immigration system. For decades, the United States has not been in complete control of its borders. As a result, many who want to work in our economy have been able to sneak across our border – and millions have stayed.

Once here, illegal immigrants live in the shadows of our society. Many use forged documents to get jobs, and that makes it difficult for employers to verify that the workers they hire are legal. Illegal immigration puts pressure on public schools and hospitals ... strains state and local budgets ... and brings crime to our communities. These are real problems, yet we must remember that the vast majority of illegal immigrants are decent people who work hard, support their families, practice their faith, and lead responsible lives. They are a part of American life – but they are beyond the reach and protection of American law.

We are a Nation of laws, and we must enforce our laws. We are also a Nation of immigrants, and we must uphold that tradition, which has strengthened our country in so many ways. These are not contradictory goals – America can be a lawful society and a welcoming society at the same time. We will fix the problems created by illegal immigration, and we will deliver a system that is secure, orderly, and fair. So I support comprehensive immigration reform that will accomplish five clear objectives.

First, the United States must secure its borders. This is a basic responsibility of a sovereign Nation. It is also an urgent requirement of our national security. Our objective is straightforward: The border should be open to trade and lawful immigration – and shut to illegal immigrants, as well as criminals, drug dealers, and terrorists.

I was the governor of a state that has a twelve-hundred mile border with Mexico. So I know how difficult it is to enforce the border, and how important it is. Since I became President, we have increased funding for border security by 66 percent, and expanded the Border Patrol from about 9,000 to 12,000 agents. The men and women of our Border Patrol are doing a fine job in difficult circumstances – and over the past five years, we have apprehended and sent home about six million people entering America illegally.

Despite this progress, we do not yet have full control of the border, and I am determined to change that. Tonight I am calling on Congress to provide funding for dramatic improvements in manpower and technology at the border. By the end of 2008, we will increase the number of Border Patrol officers by an additional 6,000. When these new agents are deployed, we will have more than doubled the size of the Border Patrol during my Presidency.

At the same time, we are launching the most technologically advanced border security initiative in American history. We will construct high-tech fences in urban corridors, and build new patrol roads and barriers in rural areas. We will employ motion sensors … infrared cameras … and unmanned aerial vehicles to prevent illegal crossings. America has the best technology in the world – and we will ensure that the Border Patrol has the technology they need to do their job and secure our border.

Training thousands of new Border Patrol agents and bringing the most advanced technology to the border will take time. Yet the need to secure our border is urgent. So I am announcing several immediate steps to strengthen border enforcement during this period of transition:

One way to help during this transition is to use the National Guard. So in coordination with governors, up to 6,000 Guard members will be deployed to our southern border. The Border Patrol will remain in the lead. The Guard will assist the Border Patrol by operating surveillance systems … analyzing intelligence … installing fences and vehicle barriers … building patrol roads … and providing training. Guard units will not be involved in direct law enforcement activities – that duty will be done by the Border Patrol. This initial commitment of Guard members would last for a period of one year. After that, the number of Guard forces will be reduced as new Border Patrol agents and new technologies come online. It is important for Americans to know that we have enough Guard forces to win the war on terror, respond to natural disasters, and help secure our border.

The United States is not going to militarize the southern border. Mexico is our neighbor, and our friend. We will continue to work cooperatively to improve security on both sides of the border ... to confront common problems like drug trafficking and crime ... and to reduce illegal immigration.

Another way to help during this period of transition is through state and local law enforcement in our border communities. So we will increase federal funding for state and local authorities assisting the Border Patrol on targeted enforcement missions. And we will give state and local authorities the specialized training they need to help federal officers apprehend and detain illegal immigrants. State and local law enforcement officials are an important resource – and they are part of our strategy to secure our border communities.

The steps I have outlined will improve our ability to catch people entering our country illegally. At the same time, we must ensure that every illegal immigrant we catch crossing our southern border is returned home. More than 85 percent of the illegal immigrants we catch crossing the southern border are Mexicans, and most are sent back home within 24 hours. But when we catch illegal immigrants from other countries, it is not as easy to send them home. For many years, the government did not have enough space in our detention facilities to hold them while the legal process unfolded. So most were released back into our society and asked to return for a court date. When the date arrived, the vast majority did not show up. This practice, called “catch and release,” is unacceptable – and we will end it.

We are taking several important steps to meet this goal. We have expanded the number of beds in our detention facilities, and we will continue to add more. We have expedited the legal process to cut the average deportation time. And we are making it clear to foreign governments that they must accept back their citizens who violate our immigration laws. As a result of these actions, we have ended “catch and release” for illegal immigrants from some countries. And I will ask Congress for additional funding and legal authority, so we can end “catch and release” at the southern border once and for all. When people know that they will be caught and sent home if they enter our country illegally, they will be less likely to try to sneak in.

Second, to secure our border, we must create a temporary worker program. The reality is that there are many people on the other side of our border who will do anything to come to America to work and build a better life. They walk across miles of desert in the summer heat, or hide in the back of 18-wheelers to reach our country. This creates enormous pressure on our border that walls and patrols alone will not stop. To secure the border effectively, we must reduce the numbers of people trying to sneak across.

Therefore, I support a temporary worker program that would create a legal path for foreign workers to enter our country in an orderly way, for a limited period of time. This program would match willing foreign workers with willing American employers for jobs Americans are not doing. Every worker who applies for the program would be required to pass criminal background checks. And temporary workers must return to their home country at the conclusion of their stay.

A temporary worker program would meet the needs of our economy, and it would give honest immigrants a way to provide for their families while respecting the law. A temporary worker program would reduce the appeal of human smugglers – and make it less likely that people would risk their lives to cross the border. It would ease the financial burden on state and local governments, by replacing illegal workers with lawful taxpayers. And above all, a temporary worker program would add to our security by making certain we know who is in our country and why they are here.

Third, we need to hold employers to account for the workers they hire. It is against the law to hire someone who is in this country illegally. Yet businesses often cannot verify the legal status of their employees, because of the widespread problem of document fraud. Therefore, comprehensive immigration reform must include a better system for verifying documents and work eligibility. A key part of that system should be a new identification card for every legal foreign worker. This card should use biometric technology, such as digital fingerprints, to make it tamper-proof. A tamper-proof card would help us enforce the law – and leave employers with no excuse for violating it. And by making it harder for illegal immigrants to find work in our country, we would discourage people from crossing the border illegally in the first place.

Fourth, we must face the reality that millions of illegal immigrants are already here. They should not be given an automatic path to citizenship. This is amnesty, and I oppose it. Amnesty would be unfair to those who are here lawfully – and it would invite further waves of illegal immigration.

Some in this country argue that the solution is to deport every illegal immigrant – and that any proposal short of this amounts to amnesty. I disagree. It is neither wise nor realistic to round up millions of people, many with deep roots in the United States, and send them across the border. There is a rational middle ground between granting an automatic path to citizenship for every illegal immigrant, and a program of mass deportation. That middle ground recognizes that there are differences between an illegal immigrant who crossed the border recently – and someone who has worked here for many years, and has a home, a family, and an otherwise clean record. I believe that illegal immigrants who have roots in our country and want to stay should have to pay a meaningful penalty for breaking the law … to pay their taxes … to learn English … and to work in a job for a number of years. People who meet these conditions should be able to apply for citizenship – but approval would not be automatic, and they will have to wait in line behind those who played by the rules and followed the law. What I have just described is not amnesty – it is a way for those who have broken the law to pay their debt to society, and demonstrate the character that makes a good citizen.

Fifth, we must honor the great American tradition of the melting pot, which has made us one Nation out of many peoples. The success of our country depends upon helping newcomers assimilate into our society, and embrace our common identity as Americans. Americans are bound together by our shared ideals, an appreciation of our history, respect for the flag we fly, and an ability to speak and write the English language. English is also the key to unlocking the opportunity of America. English allows newcomers to go from picking crops to opening a grocery … from cleaning offices to running offices … from a life of low-paying jobs to a diploma, a career, and a home of their own. When immigrants assimilate and advance in our society, they realize their dreams ... they renew our spirit ... and they add to the unity of America.

Tonight, I want to speak directly to Members of the House and the Senate: An immigration reform bill needs to be comprehensive, because all elements of this problem must be addressed together – or none of them will be solved at all. The House has passed an immigration bill. The Senate should act by the end of this month – so we can work out the differences between the two bills, and Congress can pass a comprehensive bill for me to sign into law.

America needs to conduct this debate on immigration in a reasoned and respectful tone. Feelings run deep on this issue – and as we work it out, all of us need to keep some things in mind. We cannot build a unified country by inciting people to anger, or playing on anyone’s fears, or exploiting the issue of immigration for political gain. We must always remember that real lives will be affected by our debates and decisions, and that every human being has dignity and value no matter what their citizenship papers say.

I know many of you listening tonight have a parent or a grandparent who came here from another country with dreams of a better life. You know what freedom meant to them, and you know that America is a more hopeful country because of their hard work and sacrifice. As President, I have had the opportunity to meet people of many backgrounds, and hear what America means to them. On a visit to Bethesda Naval Hospital, Laura and I met a wounded Marine named Guadalupe Denogean. Master Gunnery Sergeant Denogean came to the United States from Mexico when he was a boy. He spent his summers picking crops with his family, and then he volunteered for the United States Marine Corps as soon as he was able. During the liberation of Iraq, Master Gunnery Sergeant Denogean was seriously injured. When asked if he had any requests, he made two – a promotion for the corporal who helped rescue him … and the chance to become an American citizen. And when this brave Marine raised his right hand, and swore an oath to become a citizen of the country he had defended for more than 26 years, I was honored to stand at his side.

We will always be proud to welcome people like Guadalupe Denogean as fellow Americans. Our new immigrants are just what they have always been – people willing to risk everything for the dream of freedom. And America remains what she has always been – the great hope on the horizon … an open door to the future … a blessed and promised land. We honor the heritage of all who come here, no matter where they are from, because we trust in our country’s genius for making us all Americans – one Nation under God. Thank you, and good night.

END


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: aliens; bush; bushtruth; enforcement; guestworker; presidentialaddress; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-379 next last
To: xzins
The president's Christianity is showing:

I would like to suggest you study your Bible a little more, because obeying in part is not true Christianity. The Hebrews were never illegal aliens in Egypt. Furthermore, the word for alien is sojourner, which in Hebrew is Ger.

THE GER. This word with its kindred verb is applied with slightly varying meanings to anyone who resides in a country or a town of which he is not a full native land-owning citizen; e.g., the word is used of the patriarchs in Palestine, the Israelites in Egypt, the Levites dwelling among the Israelites (Dt 18:6; Jdg 17:7, etc.), the Ephraimite in Gibeah (Jdg 19:16). It is also particularly used of free aliens residing among the Israelites, and it is with the position of such that this article deals. This position is absolutely unparalleled in early legal systems (A. H. Post, Grundriss der ethnologischen Jurisprudenz, I, 448, note 3), which are usually far from favorable to strangers. 1. LEGAL PROVISIONS:
1. Principles.
The dominant principles of the legislation are most succinctly given in two passages: He “loveth the ger in giving him food and raiment” (Dt 10:18); “And if a ger sojourn with thee (variant “you”) in your land, ye shall not do him wrong. The ger that sojourneth with you shall be unto you as the home-born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were gerim in the land of Egypt” (Lev 19:33 f). This treatment of the stranger is based partly on historic recollection, partly on the duty of the Israelite to his God. Because the ger would be at a natural disadvantage through his alienage, he becomes one of the favorites of a legislation that gives special protection to the weak and helpless.
2. Rules.
In nationality the freeman followed his father, so that the son of a ger and an Israelitess was himself a ger (Lev 24:10-22). Special care was to be taken to do him no judicial wrong (Dt 1:16; 24:17; 27:19). In what may roughly be called criminal law it was enacted that the same rules should apply to gerim as to natives (Lev 18:26, which is due to the conception that certain abominations defile a land; 20:2, where the motive is also religious; 24:10-22; see SBL, 84 ff; Nu 35:15). A free Israelite who became his slave was subject to redemption by a relative at any time on payment of the fair price (Lev 25:47 ff). This passage and Dt 28:43 contemplate the possibility of a stranger’s becoming wealthy, but by far the greater number of the legal provisions regard him as probably poor. Thus provision is made for him to participate in tithes (Dt 14:29; 26:12), gleanings of various sorts and forgotten sheaves (Lev 19:10; 23:22; Dt 24:19, 20, 21), and poor hired servants were not to be oppressed (Dt 24:14).
221 posted on 05/15/2006 7:46:27 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Somehow we ended up with 60 million Irish when there were only about 3 to 5 million in all of Ireland. Thank God that they were willing to become true Americans.

You're wasting your time...
People ignorant of history and clueless about human nature stumble through life sounding good with their own peculiar brand of fuzzy math...

222 posted on 05/15/2006 7:47:38 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Thanks for posting the speech.

I was one of the people who thought Bush was doing a terrible job on this issue. This speech was right on.

You who are still shouting tha the pres. is failing on this issue should at least read the speech instead of knee-jerking.


223 posted on 05/15/2006 7:47:41 PM PDT by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Well, first off, the Posse Comitatus Act is to prevent US troops from engaging in civilian matters against American citizens. Securing our borders from foreign invaders is by Constitutional definition, IS the function of our military.

This is exactly right. My unfortunate Republican Senator Wayne Allard was on the radio today spouting this canard about Posse Comitatus preventing military deployment on the border. What part of foreign nation and foreign nationals is domestic? English is a tough language even for Senators I guess.

224 posted on 05/15/2006 7:48:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (Sedition and treason are getting to be a Beltway fashion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Much of this sounds good...not perfect, but good. We need to keep the heat on G.W. and the Republican congress-critters but give them their due when its appropriate. Regardless what the hardcore border people feel, it is certain that the Republicans are *much* better on this issue than the Democrats as the Dems activist base really believes the U.S. should open the borders and shoulder the burden of the world's poor as penance for the evil we (i.e. white capitalists) have visited upon the world.
225 posted on 05/15/2006 7:50:04 PM PDT by passeryby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Washi
O.K. So on the one hand, President Bush touts the fact that under his administration, it was possible to round up and deport 6 million illegal aliens. Then he says that it's not realistic to do what he just bragged had been done.

Read the text again. He said they've apprehended and turned back six million people "entering America illegally," not rounded up six million people who've already been here. BIG difference.
226 posted on 05/15/2006 7:50:05 PM PDT by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Hon, if it's good enough for the biggest border hysteric of them all, Lou Dobbs, it's good enough for me.

So Lou Dobbs is your standard for morality? Truth, justice and the American way obviously mean little to you.
227 posted on 05/15/2006 7:50:30 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: WestSylvanian
...to secure the border we must create a guest worker program."

What??? Somebody explain this one to me, please. I don't get it.

That's called "Hillary-speak" like this:

Reminds me of a fascinating quote from a Chinese Com government during the "International Woman's Conference" held in China during the Clinton administration. The government official said that they studied Hillary's speechmaking method to understand her power and success. They concluded: her trick was never actually to make any arguments -- just state conclusions that were all already accepted as self-evident by her audience. (They found that interesting and perhaps admirable, and to be emulated).

228 posted on 05/15/2006 7:51:56 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TexasPatriot8

Two words.........TONY SNOW....


229 posted on 05/15/2006 7:52:17 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

That's what Rush and Hannity do as well. What's wrong with that? They know who their audience is.


230 posted on 05/15/2006 7:53:44 PM PDT by londonboy (COME ON ENGLAND!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
We are a Nation of laws, and we must enforce our laws.

***************

Did you read this speech before you gave it, Mr. Bush?

231 posted on 05/15/2006 7:54:52 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newguy357
Read the text again. He said they've apprehended and turned back six million people "entering America illegally," not rounded up six million people who've already been here. BIG difference.

You're right. It's much harder to find people living in a fixed location, going to the same job every day, than it is to find people on their guard trying to sneak across miles of open border.

232 posted on 05/15/2006 8:00:13 PM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: TexasPatriot8
but I don't get all the hostility towards him by folks here. I mean, if he's serious and does what he says, how is it a bad thing??? Am I missing something?

Obviously, you are. Perhaps your memory blocked this out from our president in 2004...

Some temporary workers will make the decision to pursue American citizenship. Those who make this choice will be allowed to apply in the normal way. They will not be given unfair advantage over people who have followed legal procedures from the start. I oppose amnesty, placing undocumented workers on the automatic path to citizenship. Granting amnesty encourages the violation of our laws, and perpetuates illegal immigration. America is a welcoming country, but citizenship must not be the automatic reward for violating the laws of America.

Not exactly what I heard tonight. He couldn't even bring himself to define the problem. He wasted lots of words defining the value of legal immigrants. Unfortunately that's not the problem that is dividing us.

233 posted on 05/15/2006 8:01:56 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Chena
"Dang, those pesky facts always prevent me from being invited to the Bush-Bashing party. ;)"

Hehehehehe. Yeah. I have yet to see a single post by someone having kittens about this speach that can't be totally deconstructed by quoting lines from the actual speach. The opposition to this speach is shrill and shallow and without a basis in fact. It's that simple.

234 posted on 05/15/2006 8:02:01 PM PDT by TexasPatriot8 (Vote Republican. A conservative America, for a better future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Tancredo must be a RINO now. He likes the plan and the speech.


235 posted on 05/15/2006 8:03:32 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: TexasPatriot8; potlatch; devolve; PhilDragoo; Smartass; Tony Snow
I mean, if he's serious and does what he says, how is it a bad thing??? Am I missing something?

If he were serious, border control would have been job one after 9/11/01, if not before. By definition he can't be serious about illegal immigration, if in the 6th year of his presidency he only made this speech to quiet his conservative critics. I know what he said. It was just words. The national guardsmen, who should be resuming their jobs and normal lives, might spend some token time freeing up immigration agents, but Pres. Bush's heart is where it has been these 5 1/2 years that he's been setting the agenda. The results will be no different than if he hadn't made the speech.

236 posted on 05/15/2006 8:03:36 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TexasPatriot8

amnesty. period. I don't give a damn what you do or don't call me. They have lost my vote. Period.


237 posted on 05/15/2006 8:05:49 PM PDT by steel_resolve (BUSH IS WHACK ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

Who you voting for the communist or don't vote and let them get in anyways!


238 posted on 05/15/2006 8:05:51 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
As Prepared for Delivery
From http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/immigration/ (it varies slightly)
This is a basic responsibility of a sovereign Nation.
And then it's a country...
...To Enter Our Country...
...who is in our country ...
...The Success Of Our Country...
We cannot build a unified country...

Sorry, a pet peeve of mine.

The House And Senate Must Pass A Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill
And so we wait some more...
Tonight, I will make it clear where I stand, and where I want to lead our country on this vital issue.
Thanks for the comments Mr. President.

Mexico is our neighbor and friend.
Political niceties in action. I understand the need.
A man shows up in your front yard one day. You recognize him as one of your neighbor's relatives, who is standing at the fence between your yards watching you. The man promptly starts setting up camp in your front yard. You tell him to leave and he stares at you, while your neighbor roars with laughter, and continues with what he was doing. You call the police and they say they'll pass by when they get the chance.
Days pass and you hear nothing from the police. The man has started robbing your house and is even giving his relative the power tools out of your garage. He mowed the lawn down the street, the one your son had been told he could cut, and then gave the mower to his relative as well.
Need I go on?
I don't know how your friends and neighbors treat you, but I wouldn't want that type of person as a friend or neighbor until they changed their ways.
And with the temporary worker program...the horse don't want the water. He's been standing in the middle of the river and won't bend his neck to drink. You can lead a horse to water...

An aside...A key part of that system should be a new identification card for every legal foreign worker. This card should use biometric technology, such as digital fingerprints, to make it tamper-proof. A tamper-proof card would help us enforce the law – and leave employers with no excuse for violating it.
Wouldn't somebody just have to lie about whether or not they were a legal foreign worker to begin with and show forged identification thus eliminating the need for such a card? Isn't that basically what is happening now? Almost all have seen the "Are you a US Citizen" box before.
I can also envision employers demanding the cards from Citizens in order to be "fair" or in compliance to some law.
Lots of potential for unintended consequences in that.

239 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:20 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Tancredo must be a RINO now. He likes the plan and the speech.

Wrong! He liked parts of the speech, and was especially critical of illegals being given amnesty and being allowed to wait in the States while those trying to immigrate here legally have to wait overseas. Under the Bush plan illegals do not have to go to the back of the line.
240 posted on 05/15/2006 8:06:41 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-379 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson